mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hardware Mechanisms to Dynamically Throttle AI Performance

arXiv 2607.18069 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.AR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As more capable AI models are increasingly integrated into critical computer systems, the lack of control over AI intent motivates safety mechanisms. Existing software safeguards impose only behavioral constraints that can potentially be bypassed by sufficiently intelligent models. While hardware-level safety enforcement has been recognized as an essential last line of defense, few mechanisms have been proposed beyond policy regulations on unauthorized accesses or coarse full-chip shutdown. What is missing is a fine-grained, dynamic intervention mechanism at the architecture level. In this paper, we introduce a set of microarchitecture knobs which dynamically control the available hardware resources to limit AI performance at runtime. We evaluate candidate knobs spanning the GPU memory subsystem, across capacity, bandwidth, latency and frequency dimensions, and narrow down to four strong candidates: L2 size, L2 latency, L2 bandwidth, and shared memory port access rate. To minimize new logic and extra design cost, we build all four mechanisms from well-established microarchitectural primitives: cache way masking, credit-based rate limiting, latency insertion, and bank arbitration. We show that these knobs achieve high performance sensitivity (up to 80% performance cut at 1/8 resource availability), negligible implementation cost (<~10K flip flops), fast stabilization after dynamic throttling (5-80K cycles), and minimal collateral impact on the rest of the chip. Further, multi-knob analysis reveals combinations of knobs that amplify the performance degradation beyond the effect of each knob individually, which enables a broader range of performance targets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 70 references.

References · 18

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  4. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
  5. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  6. 2024FlashAttention-3: Fast and Accurate Attention with Asynchrony and Low-precisioncited by 519
  7. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 491
  8. 2024Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AIcited by 48
  9. 2024Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligencecited by 40
  10. 2026Think Fast: Estimating No-CoT Task-Completion Time Horizons of Frontier AI Modelscited by 12
  11. 2025Hardware-Enabled Mechanisms for Verifying Responsible AI Developmentcited by 8
  12. 2016A Survey and Measurement Study of GPU DVFS on Energy Conservationcited by 6
6 more
  1. 2025The Loss of Control Playbook: Degrees, Dynamics, and Preparednesscited by 5
  2. 2021Vortex: Extending the RISC-V ISA for GPGPU and 3D-GraphicsResearchcited by 4
  3. 2026Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Regulatory Compliance and Treaty Verificationcited by 4
  4. 2024Near-Term Enforcement of AI Chip Export Controls Using A Firmware-Based Design for Offline Licensingcited by 2
  5. 2025Embedded Off-Switches for AI Computecited by 2
  6. 2020Latch-Based Logic Lockingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.