A Weisfeiler-Leman Characterization of Global-Attention Graph Transformers for Mixed-Integer Linear Programs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph foundation models (GFMs) with global attention are increasingly used to represent mixed-integer linear programs (MILPs), aiming to capture structure beyond the locality of standard graph neural networks. We study their expressive power through graph isomorphism testing, asking which MILP instances they map to identical representations. We prove that a broad class of hierarchical graph transformers combining global linear attention, edge-weighted cross-attention, and bipartite message passing is bounded by the one-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman (1-WL) test: under any parameter setting, 1-WL-equivalent MILP graphs receive identical graph embeddings. Our compositional proof shows that each architectural component is a symmetric multiset function and thus preserves 1-WL equivalence. We validate this characterization across ten diverse graph encoders, including Graphormer-, GraphGPS-, Set-Transformer-, and Gasse-style models. Across model capacities, graph scales, and pooling operators, every tested encoder maps 1-WL-equivalent non-isomorphic graph pairs to numerically identical embeddings. Consequently, graph invariants that vary within a 1-WL equivalence class cannot be recovered from these representations. We further show that expressiveness beyond 1-WL arises from input encoding rather than attention: random-walk positional encodings separate the constructed pairs, while additional constructions expose the limits of this remedy. These results characterize the expressive power of global-attention GFMs and provide an encoder-agnostic diagnostic for detecting 1-WL-induced representation equivalence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 23 references.
References · 17
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 881
- 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
- 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 623
- 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 333
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 320
- 2019Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 318
- 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 198
- 2020Random Features Strengthen Graph Neural Networkscited by 186
- 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 133
- 2020Hybrid Models for Learning to Branchcited by 95
5 more
- 2020Ecole: A Gym-like Library for Machine Learning in Combinatorial Optimization Solverscited by 43
- 2022On Representing Mixed-Integer Linear Programs by Graph Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2024Comparing Graph Transformers via Positional Encodingscited by 20
- 2023On Structural Expressive Power of Graph Transformerscited by 19
- 2024Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Lemancited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.