Token-Level Off-Policy Learning for Faithful Generation Under Distribution Shift
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose Token-Level Off-Policy Labeling (TOPL), an off-policy training paradigm that reframes post-training as a token-level correctness prediction task. Our key intuition is that by training the model to distinguish good and bad tokens in a response, we naturally guide the model towards generating good tokens, while avoiding the pitfalls that come with directly training the model to generate off-policy tokens. Experiments on document summarization tasks show that TOPL achieves strong out-of-distribution generalization across 11 datasets against a diverse set of sequence-level and token-level baselines. We further demonstrate that TOPL transfers effectively to machine translation, suggesting that its benefits generalize across different faithful generation tasks. Through ablation studies, we confirm that our token-level learning signal is critical to good performance; sequence-level analogues do not confer similar benefits. Finally, we show that TOPL induces interpretable model updates: the LoRA adapters learned through TOPL function as linear classification heads and steering vectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.
Builds on
30 of 35 references.
References · 30
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
18 more
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
- 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 251
- 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 199
- 2024Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steeringcited by 191
- 2024Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Modelscited by 146
- 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 135
- 2022Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectorscited by 103
- 2025HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 88
- 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
- 2025LLaVA-Critic-R1: Your Critic Model is Secretly a Strong Policy Modelcited by 34
- 2025Toward universal steering and monitoring of AI modelscited by 29
- 2024TLDR: Token-Level Detective Reward Model for Large Vision Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Gradient Imbalance in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.