Backpropagation-Free Trunk Training via the Split Forward Gradients
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Backpropagation makes training deep networks memory intensive because it must store intermediate activations. Forward-mode methods avoid this cost, but their gradient estimates become increasingly noisy as the number of trained parameters grows. We introduce Split Forward Gradient (Split-FG), which splits a network at an intermediate representation: it computes the output head gradient exactly and estimates only the trunk gradient with a Jacobian--vector product. This reduces estimator variance and requires no backward pass through the trunk, while retaining an Adam-style convergence guarantee. Our experiments reveal an important practical failure mode. On WikiText-103, naive forward-gradient training of the trunk performs worse than leaving a randomly initialized trunk frozen, likely because Adam updates every noisy, under-determined trunk coordinate too aggressively. Simply using a much smaller learning rate for the trunk reverses this result: a 16M-parameter GPT-2-style model reaches validation perplexity 387, compared with 668 for the frozen-trunk control and 2,885 for a matched pure forward-gradient baseline (backpropagation reaches 150). Split-FG also produces the strongest backprop-free results on our tabular benchmarks and reaches 60.5% on CIFAR-10 and 35.2% on CIFAR-100 with a heavy-head design. It reduces peak memory by up to 35% relative to matched backpropagation, although the performance gap widens as the forward-mode trunk grows.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2026.
Builds on
19 of 31 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 825
- 2019Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 788
- 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
- 2017Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networkscited by 529
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 461
- 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 337
- 2022The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigationscited by 262
- 2016Equilibrium Propagation: Bridging the Gap Between Energy-Based Models and Backpropagationcited by 251
- 2016Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 240
- 2017The Reversible Residual Network: Backpropagation Without Storing Activationscited by 215
7 more
- 2024TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensemblingcited by 105
- 2020Predictive Coding Approximates Backprop along Arbitrary Computation Graphscited by 89
- 2023DeepZero: Scaling up Zeroth-Order Optimization for Deep Model Trainingcited by 76
- 2022Scaling Forward Gradient With Local Lossescited by 65
- 2020Scaling Equilibrium Propagation to Deep ConvNets by Drastically Reducing its Gradient Estimator Biascited by 60
- 2018Training of photonic neural networks through in situ backpropagationcited by 45
- 2021Reverse Differentiation via Predictive Codingcited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.