K-IPO: Kendall-constrained Importance Preserving Oversampling for Imbalanced Tabular Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Oversampling is widely used to address class imbalance in tabular classification, but existing methods can distort the feature importance ranking underlying model explanations. Although recent studies have quantified this distortion by comparing real and synthetic data, none have actively sought to prevent it. In this paper, we introduce Kendall-constrained Importance-Preserving Oversampling (K-IPO), a generator-agnostic, "generate-then-select" framework that preserves the original data's feature importance ranking during augmentation. K-IPO iteratively generates minority-class candidates and accepts them only if their inclusion maintains a user-defined minimum Kendall's tau (τ) correlation with the reference ranking. Optionally, stricter constraints can be applied to the highest-ranked features. We evaluated K-IPO on 20 imbalanced binary classification datasets using three classifiers and multiple explanation methods. In most cases, K-IPO achieved the best or tied-best results in feature importance preservation, explanation consistency, and class separability. It also generally improved predictive performance while maintaining competitive computational overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2026.
Builds on
22 of 67 references.
References · 22
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
- 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 373
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
- 2020GAMI-Net: An Explainable Neural Network based on Generalized Additive Models with Structured Interactionscited by 82
- 2020Conditional Wasserstein GAN-based Oversampling of Tabular Data for Imbalanced Learningcited by 67
- 2024SynthEval: A Framework for Detailed Utility and Privacy Evaluation of Tabular Synthetic Datacited by 27
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Synthetic Tabular Data Generationcited by 27
- 2023Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmarkcited by 23
- 2021Preventing Oversmoothing in VAE via Generalized Variance Parameterizationcited by 15
- 2022Faking feature importance: A cautionary tale on the use of differentially-private synthetic datacited by 8
- 2024Your copula is a classifier in disguise: classification-based copula density estimationcited by 8
10 more
- 2024Synthetic Tabular Data Generation for Imbalanced Classification: The Surprising Effectiveness of an Overlap Classcited by 8
- 2024Statistical Significance of Feature Importance Rankingscited by 7
- 2023The Effect of Balancing Methods on Model Behavior in Imbalanced Classification Problemscited by 5
- 2022Nonparametric Copula Models for Multivariate, Mixed, and Missing Datacited by 4
- 2023PiML Toolbox for Interpretable Machine Learning Model Development and Diagnosticscited by 4
- 2024Preserving logical and functional dependencies in synthetic tabular datacited by 4
- 2022Feature Selection with Distance Correlationcited by 3
- 2025CopulaSMOTE: A Copula-Based Oversampling Approach for Imbalanced Classification in Diabetes Predictioncited by 2
- 2025What's Wrong with Your Synthetic Tabular Data? Using Explainable AI to Evaluate Generative Modelscited by 1
- 2025SHAP Distance: An Explainability-Aware Metric for Evaluating the Semantic Fidelity of Synthetic Tabular Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.