Intelligence-Guided Adaptive Purification for DDoS-Resilient Quantum Networks: A CUDA-Q based Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum-repeater networks require adaptive control policies that balance entanglement generation rate, end-to-end fidelity, purification overhead, and memory-induced latency. This tradeoff becomes more complex when the classical control plane is degraded by cyber anomalies or denial-of-service traffic. We develop a CUDA-Q/SeQUeNCe co-simulation workflow for studying adaptive entanglement purification in heterogeneous linear repeater chains. CUDA-Q noisy quantum kernels are used to estimate primitive entanglement purification and swapping behavior, while SeQUeNCe provides an event-layer model for stochastic link generation, waiting-time-dependent memory decay, purification failure, and end-to-end swapping. Under stationary conditions, we compare no purification, local threshold purification, mean-field predictive purification, fixed purification, and a resource-penalized risk-aware predictive policy. In an 8-node chain, the resource-penalized risk-aware controller increases above-target delivery probability relative to fixed purification while reducing latency and purification overhead. We then couple the quantum-network controller to anomaly scores derived from the CSE-CIC-IDS2018 benign-to-SSDP intrusion-detection trace. During the attack period, the attack-unaware controller maintains high raw delivery, but its above-target entanglement delivery falls to 0.098+/-0.007; the IDS-aware resource-adaptive controller switches to more purification-heavy masks and increases above-target delivery to 0.344+/-0.011, closely matching the oracle-aware value of approximately 0.335. These results demonstrate that cyber-state awareness can improve useful quantum-network outcomes by trading raw throughput for fidelity-qualified entanglement delivery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.
Builds on
19 of 84 references.
References · 19
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 377
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
- 2019Quantum Natural Gradientcited by 104
- 2020Entanglement Induced Barren Plateauscited by 101
- 2024Applying Quantum Autoencoders for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 6
- 2021An Adaptable Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System to Zero-Day Attackscited by 5
- 2016Shortcuts to quantum network routingcited by 3
- 2020A Content-Based Deep Intrusion Detection Systemcited by 3
- 2020Policies for elementary links in a quantum networkcited by 3
- 2024State of practice: evaluating GPU performance of state vector and tensor network methodscited by 3
- 2024Entanglement Routing in Quantum Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 3
- 2023Identifying Relevant Features of CSE-CIC-IDS2018 Dataset for the Development of an Intrusion Detection Systemcited by 2
7 more
- 2025Harnessing CUDA-Q's MPS for Tensor Network Simulations of Large-Scale Quantum Circuitscited by 2
- 2024Synchronization Control-Plane Protocol for Quantum Link Layercited by 1
- 2024Efficient Routing on Quantum Networks using Adaptive Clusteringcited by 1
- 2025SeQUeNCe GUI: An Extensible User Interface for Discrete Event Quantum Network Simulationscited by 1
- 2025A Short Scalability Study on the SeQUeNCe Parallel Quantum Network Simulatorcited by 1
- 2025Quantum Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection in Cybersecuritycited by 1
- 2026Spectral Geometry and Bosonic-Bloch Probes: Explorations in Quantum Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.