mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

An Auto-Scaling Approach for Serverless Environments Based on a Multi-Expert Consensus Mechanism

arXiv 2607.15511 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Serverless computing provides automatic resource management and pay-per-use execution, but effective autoscaling remains challenging because of dynamic workloads, cold-start latency, and dependencies among functions. We present a dependency-aware autoscaling framework that integrates graph-based bottleneck identification, short-term workload forecasting, multi-model consensus, and cost-aware scaling control. Serverless applications are represented as directed dependency graphs, and structurally important functions are identified using weighted degree centrality. Resource demand is predicted using lightweight MLP, LSTM, and CNN models. Their outputs are combined through a performance-weighted probabilistic ensemble inspired by Bayesian model averaging. The controller further incorporates cold-start awareness and cost comparison to select among scale-up, scale-down, and hold actions. Experiments using real workload traces show that supervised forecasting substantially outperforms unsupervised clustering for autoscaling decision generation. The proposed ensemble achieves 99.88 percent prediction accuracy and reduces prediction error compared with representative hybrid forecasting methods. Evaluations across multiple cloud pricing models also demonstrate consistent infrastructure cost reductions while maintaining performance targets. The results show that combining dependency analysis, multi-expert forecasting, and cost-aware control provides a robust and practical solution for serverless autoscaling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 95 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023What and How does In-Context Learning Learn? Bayesian Model Averaging, Parameterization, and Generalizationcited by 113
  2. 2022Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 75
  3. 2020Do RNN and LSTM have Long Memory?cited by 47
  4. 2015Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classificationcited by 29
  5. 2023A Primer on Bayesian Neural Networks: Review and Debatescited by 26
  6. 2016A Survey and Taxonomy of Self-Aware and Self-Adaptive Cloud Autoscaling Systemscited by 18
  7. 2019Serverless Computing: A Survey of Opportunities, Challenges and Applicationscited by 11
  8. 2021Working Memory Connections for LSTMcited by 10
  9. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Spectral Clustering with Graph Structure Learningcited by 10
  10. 2017Simplified Gating in Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 6
  11. 2020AI-based Resource Allocation: Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Auto-scaling in Serverless Environmentscited by 5
  12. 2021A Holistic View on Resource Management in Serverless Computing Environments: Taxonomy and Future Directionscited by 5
10 more
  1. 2016LSTM with Working Memorycited by 4
  2. 2022Rise of the Planet of Serverless Computing: A Systematic Reviewcited by 4
  3. 2015Depth-Gated LSTMcited by 3
  4. 2023A Deep Reinforcement Learning based Algorithm for Time and Cost Optimized Scaling of Serverless Applicationscited by 3
  5. 2017Automatic Cloud Resource Scaling Algorithm based on Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networkcited by 2
  6. 2024Self-adaptive, Requirements-driven Autoscaling of Microservicescited by 2
  7. 2023Dirigo: Self-scaling Stateful Actors For Serverless Real-time Data Processingcited by 1
  8. 2025Non-Stationary Gradient Descent for Optimal Auto-Scaling in Serverless Platformscited by 1
  9. 2025Marlin: Efficient Coordination for Autoscaling Cloud DBMS (Extended Version)cited by 1
  10. 2025Key Considerations for Auto-Scaling: Lessons from Benchmark Microservicescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.