mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MedFailBench: A Clinician-Built Open-Source Benchmark for Medical AI Safety Boundary Inspection

arXiv 2607.15166 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most medical AI benchmarks measure whether a model knows the correct answer. MedFailBench asks a different question: which safety boundary failed? We present a synthetic benchmark and failure atlas built by a clinician. The resource labels medical AI errors by severity from 1 to 5 and safety gate type: missed urgent escalation, unsafe remote dosing, unsafe discharge reassurance, evidence fabrication, unsafe protocol execution, and source support gap. The current public release (v0.2.1) contains 44 synthetic cases reviewed by a clinician, with severity annotations, a public Hugging Face Space source, a safety gate taxonomy, a clinical severity rubric, and an automated pipeline for archiving model response screening runs. Forty cases have a populated safety gate field, and four require gate completion. No patient data, clinical validation claims, or model rankings are included. MedFailBench is released under Apache-2.0 and CC-BY-4.0 and carries the Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21205535.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

3 of 20 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2025Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questionscited by 18
  3. 2024Setting Standards in Turkish NLP: TR-MMLU for Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.