mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SAGA: Schema-Aware Grounding for Agentic Text-to-SPARQL Generation

arXiv 2607.14494 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Complex knowledge base question answering (KBQA) is commonly approached through either information retrieval over a question-specific subgraph or semantic parsing into an executable logical form. We study the latter paradigm. Recent large language model agents make semantic parsing interactive: they alternate between reasoning, querying the knowledge base, and extending a partial SPARQL query. This interleaving reduces reliance on one-shot generation, but makes the quality of KB grounding depend on what the interaction tools expose. Existing agents retrieve or prune candidate properties mainly through lexical relevance and instance-level observations, without systematically conditioning on entity types, property domains and ranges, or the expected answer type. We call this failure mode type-blind grounding. It enlarges the grounding search space and often produces plausible-looking but semantically incompatible triple patterns that execute to empty results. We propose SAGA (underlineSchema-underlineAware underlineGrounding for underlineAgentic Text-to-SPARQL Generation), a training-free framework that turns property exploration into a schema-constrained grounding operation. SAGA maintains a persistent bidirectional type state, filters known-incompatible property candidates at construction time, presents the remaining graph patterns in a compact schema-annotated format, and handles missing schema information permissively through empirical and trace-local evidence. Across nine benchmark settings over Wikidata and Freebase, SAGA achieves the highest F1 on all nine settings and the highest exact-match accuracy on eight, while reducing empty-result queries across all reported Wikidata settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

Builds on

6 of 23 references.

References · 6

  1. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  2. 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 409
  3. 2023Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphcited by 235
  4. 2020Beyond I.I.D.: Three Levels of Generalization for Question Answering on Knowledge Basescited by 169
  5. 2021Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering: A Surveycited by 52
  6. 2022QALD-9-plus: A Multilingual Dataset for Question Answering over DBpedia and Wikidata Translated by Native Speakerscited by 39

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Researcher Agents for Knowledge-Graph Question Answering
  2. 2025From Graph Retrieval to Schema Realization: Counterfactual Validation for Text-to-SPARQL over Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs
  3. 2026KGVoyager: Knowledge Graph Agnostic Question Answering via Agentic Navigation
  4. 2026AutoSchema: Live Schema Grounding for Agentic Text-to-Sparql over Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs
  5. 2026MARS: Multi-hop Adaptive Retrieval and SPARQL Generation for KGQA
  6. 2025AGENTIQL: An Agent-Inspired Multi-Expert Framework for Text-to-SQL Generation
  7. 2025Text-to-SPARQL Goes Beyond English: Multilingual Question Answering Over Knowledge Graphs through Human-Inspired Reasoning
  8. 2025GRASP: Generic Reasoning And SPARQL Generation across Knowledge Graphs