mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CausalGraphX: A Counterfactual Graph Neural Network Framework for Explainable Systemic Risk Assessment

arXiv 2607.14416 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The interconnected nature of global financial systems makes them vulnerable to systemic risks, where the failure of a few institutions can trigger catastrophic cascading defaults. Traditional risk models often fail to capture the complex, non-linear dynamics of these networks. While Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown promise in modeling relational data, they primarily learn correlative patterns and function as black boxes, offering little insight into the causal mechanisms of shock propagation. This limitation is critical for regulators who require explainable models to perform stress tests and devise effective interventions. We introduce CausalGraphX, a novel framework that integrates GNNs with counterfactual reasoning to provide explainable assessments of systemic risk. CausalGraphX employs a Graph Attention mechanism to learn representations of institutional vulnerability and uses an adversarial regularization technique to ensure these representations capture causal drivers rather than spurious correlations. Furthermore, we propose an optimization-based approach to generate counterfactual explanations, answering questions such as, "What minimum capital injection would have prevented Bank A's default under a specific stress scenario?" We validate CausalGraphX on large-scale synthetic financial networks. Our results demonstrate that CausalGraphX significantly outperforms traditional and deep learning baselines in predicting cascading defaults while providing sparse, plausible, and actionable counterfactual explanations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 15 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  6. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 329
  7. 2019Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensicscited by 164
  8. 2021CF-GNNExplainer: Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 119

Built on by

Not cited yet.