T5-CSBoost: Adversarial Perturbation Resistant LLM Fingerprinting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While many AI-generated text (AIGT) detectors achieve strong performance on clean inputs, their accuracy degrades significantly under light paraphrasing, word substitutions, character edits, and distribution shifts. We present T5 Contrastive Style Boosted Classifier (T5-CSBoost), an extension to the T5-Sentinel framework that keeps the original next-token prediction objective for source attribution while introducing an auxiliary margin-based triplet loss over decoder embeddings. This contrastive style regularization encourages the learning of compact, perturbation-resistant stylistic representations, offering a lightweight yet effective alternative to prior approaches that rely on architectural modifications, adversarial training, or complex multi-task objectives without altering the underlying T5-small backbone. T5-CSBoost achieves state-of-the-art multiclass source attribution and binary human-vs-LLM detection on OpenLLMText and HC3 AIGT benchmarks. More importantly, T5-CSBoost demonstrates enhanced robustness to word and character level adversarial perturbations of up to 90% intensity, achieving state-of-the-art on the challenging MAGE/Deepfake stress-test suite, including unseen models, unseen domains, and extreme paraphrasing scenarios. Our results highlight that explicitly regularizing stylistic embeddings via contrastive learning is a practical and effective strategy for building more robust LLM fingerprinting systems in real-world adversarial settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 35 references.
References · 23
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
11 more
- 2023Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Modelscited by 55
- 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 52
- 2024Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprintscited by 31
- 2023Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Textcited by 26
- 2025DAMAGE: Detecting Adversarially Modified AI Generated Textcited by 20
- 2024Are AI-Generated Text Detectors Robust to Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 16
- 2022SCGC : Self-Supervised Contrastive Graph Clusteringcited by 13
- 2023TOPFORMER: Topology-Aware Authorship Attribution of Deepfake Texts with Diverse Writing Stylescited by 10
- 2025Not all tokens are created equal: Perplexity Attention Weighted Networks for AI generated text detectioncited by 3
- 2022Efficient block contrastive learning via parameter-free meta-node approximationcited by 2
- 2022NBC-Softmax : Darkweb Author fingerprinting and migration trackingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.