UniSAGE: Unifying Static and Dynamic Attributes with Hyper-Structure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the rapid growth of digital data, real-world applications increasingly involve hierarchical information that combines static attributes with dynamic records. Modeling such heterogeneous data in a unified and generalizable manner remains challenging. Existing approaches often rely on extensive manual design, are tightly coupled to specific data schemas, and typically process static and dynamic attributes in isolation, thereby overlooking their implicit interactions. We propose UniSAGE, a unified framework for modeling data with both static and dynamic attributes. UniSAGE constructs a global attribute graph that represents hierarchical and temporal relationships in a unified structure. To ensure representational consistency, it introduces two orthogonal parameter subspaces that jointly support static aggregation and dynamic reasoning within a shared semantic space. Building on these unified representations, UniSAGE further enables task-specific interaction between static and dynamic attributes via a lightweight hyper-structure mechanism. UniSAGE is fully automated, robust to evolving data schemas, and capable of capturing complex cross-attribute dependencies. Extensive experiments on multiple public benchmarks and a real-world financial behavior dataset demonstrate that UniSAGE consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving performance improvements of over 10% on several tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
24 of 51 references.
References · 24
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
- 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
- 2020How Neural Networks Extrapolate: From Feedforward to Graph Neural Networkscited by 222
- 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 159
- 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
12 more
- 2020Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A surveycited by 124
- 2024RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databasescited by 96
- 2021Graph Learning based Recommender Systems: A Reviewcited by 59
- 2023Relational Deep Learning: Graph Representation Learning on Relational Databasescited by 56
- 2022Graph Neural Networks are Dynamic Programmerscited by 55
- 2025RelGNN: Composite Message Passing for Relational Deep Learningcited by 48
- 2022Graph Neural Networks are Inherently Good Generalizers: Insights by Bridging GNNs and MLPscited by 42
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: Models, Frameworks, Benchmarks, Experiments and Challengescited by 30
- 2025Relational Deep Learning: Challenges, Foundations and Next-Generation Architecturescited by 23
- 2023Dynamic Graph Representation Learning with Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 15
- 2024SocialRec: User Activity Based Post Weighted Dynamic Personalized Post Recommendation System in Social Mediacited by 4
- 2023How Graph Neural Networks Learn: Lessons from Training Dynamicscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.