mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLIP-Guided Label-Free Discriminative Region Scoring for Fine-Grained Classification

arXiv 2607.13437 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent vision models such as CLIP and SAM enable training-free segmentation and semantic encoding for fine-grained classification. A common approach is to compare the representations of segmented image regions with the text prompt embeddings of the corresponding labels. However, it remains unclear how different local regions and CLIP-based scoring strategies affect the selection of discriminative evidence, especially when ground-truth labels are unavailable. In this paper, we propose a unified CLIP-guided label-free region scoring framework for fine-grained classification. The framework evaluates cosine similarity-based, margin-based, and entropy-based scoring strategies using both SAM-generated masks and random crops, and introduces two label-free pseudo-label variants based on global image embeddings and local region embeddings. We conduct experiments on five fine-grained classification datasets to systematically compare different region generation methods and scoring strategies. The results show that Soft Negative Margin scoring achieves the strongest performance, and pseudo-label scoring closely approximates true-label performance. Although SAM produces semantically meaningful masks, random-crop-based pseudo-label scoring consistently outperforms SAM-based scoring across all datasets, suggesting that random crops preserve surrounding information and provide more stable semantic context when pseudo-labels are noisy. In addition, SAM masks benefit from aggregating embeddings from all regions, whereas random crops tend to perform better with a smaller top-k subset. These findings provide new insights for fine-grained classification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  4. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  5. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  6. 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 134
  7. 2014Part-based R-CNNs for Fine-grained Category Detectioncited by 107
  8. 2018Learning to Navigate for Fine-grained Classificationcited by 103
  9. 2017Fine-graind Image Classification via Combining Vision and Languagecited by 51
  10. 2024Visual-Text Cross Alignment: Refining the Similarity Score in Vision-Language Modelscited by 30
  11. 2016Diversified Visual Attention Networks for Fine-Grained Object Classificationcited by 26
  12. 2024Test-Time Adaptation with SaLIP: A Cascade of SAM and CLIP for Zero shot Medical Image Segmentationcited by 25
2 more
  1. 2023Fine-grained Visual Classification with High-temperature Refinement and Background Suppressioncited by 22
  2. 2025Towards Fine-Grained Adaptation of CLIP via a Self-Trained Alignment Scorecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.