Decentralized Gradient Descent: Bottleneck Regimes and Budget Complexity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decentralized gradient descent (DGD) is widely used for solving distributed optimization problems over networks of agents. While its convergence properties are well understood, less is known about the communication and computation resources required to attain a prescribed accuracy. In this paper, we study DGD from a resource-aware perspective and characterize the communication-computation budget required to attain a target error level. We develop a bottleneck-centric framework in which different factors dominate the optimization dynamics at different error scales. Specifically, we identify operating regimes governed by initialization, objective heterogeneity and network connectivity, gradient noise, and communication noise. To capture these effects, we introduce two fundamental quantities: the gradient-Diversity-to-Network-connectivity Ratio (DNR) and the Gradient-to-Communication-noise Ratio (GCR). We show that these quantities determine the sequence of bottlenecks encountered during optimization and the corresponding budget-optimal operating strategy. Using a multi-stage analysis, we derive optimal stepsize selections and explicit budget-complexity bounds that quantify the budget resources required to attain a prescribed accuracy. The resulting expressions reveal how the overall budget decomposes into contributions associated with successive bottlenecks and provide insight into the fundamental tradeoffs among objective heterogeneity, network connectivity, gradient noise, and communication noise.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
22 of 41 references.
References · 22
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 500
- 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 220
- 2014EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimizationcited by 160
- 2013On the Convergence of Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 158
- 2016NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 107
- 2018Communication Compression for Decentralized Trainingcited by 88
- 2019Federated Learning with Cooperating Devices: A Consensus Approach for Massive IoT Networkscited by 79
- 2021Federated Learning over Wireless Device-to-Device Networks: Algorithms and Convergence Analysiscited by 51
- 2017Exact Diffusion for Distributed Optimization and Learning --- Part I: Algorithm Developmentcited by 50
- 2020A Linearly Convergent Algorithm for Decentralized Optimization: Sending Less Bits for Free!cited by 42
- 2018An Exact Quantized Decentralized Gradient Descent Algorithmcited by 36
- 2014Stochastic Gradient-Push for Strongly Convex Functions on Time-Varying Directed Graphscited by 32
10 more
- 2017Balancing Communication and Computation in Distributed Optimizationcited by 23
- 2019On Maintaining Linear Convergence of Distributed Learning and Optimization under Limited Communicationcited by 16
- 2021Finite-Bit Quantization For Distributed Algorithms With Linear Convergencecited by 15
- 2022Asynchronous Decentralized Learning over Unreliable Wireless Networkscited by 13
- 2020Decentralized optimization over noisy, rate-constrained networks: Achieving consensus by communicating differencescited by 12
- 2025Unified Analysis of Decentralized Gradient Descent: a Contraction Mapping Frameworkcited by 10
- 2022A Compressed Gradient Tracking Method for Decentralized Optimization with Linear Convergencecited by 9
- 2022Non-Coherent Over-the-Air Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 9
- 2020On the Convergence of Nested Decentralized Gradient Methods with Multiple Consensus and Gradient Stepscited by 5
- 2021Convergence results of a nested decentralized gradient method for non-strongly convex problemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.