Connected by Construction: Learning Tractable Near-Tour Marginals for Traveling Salesman Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning-based methods for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) are often evaluated through the tours produced after decoding or search, but the learned object itself frequently lives in a surrogate space such as heatmaps, assignments, construction policies, or search-guidance scores. This hides the fundamental question: what Hamiltonian structure has actually been learned before decoding? In this study, we directly answer this question by learning TSP through a structurally meaningful latent object, rather than leaving most of the Hamiltonian structure to the final decoding stage. Based on a connected-by-construction rooted 1-tree Gibbs family, we propose an end-to-end unsupervised learning pipeline called C2TSP. The pipeline learns residual edge perturbations from unbiased TSP cost through implicit differentiation. For structural correction, a smoothed Held--Karp layer restores expected degree balance, while certificate-guided sharpening further pushes the connected distribution toward more tour-like structures. Experiments show that C2TSP yields strong decoding performance while preserving interpretable structural information. Ablations further verify that edge perturbation and certificate-guided sharpening jointly improve both tour cost and tour-like structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
21 of 25 references.
References · 21
- 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
- 2018Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!cited by 656
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
- 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 608
- 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 599
- 2019Differentiable Convex Optimization Layerscited by 465
- 2020POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learningcited by 348
- 2023DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 221
- 2021Efficient and Modular Implicit Differentiationcited by 203
- 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 175
- 2020Generalize a Small Pre-trained Model to Arbitrarily Large TSP Instancescited by 162
- 2022DIMES: A Differentiable Meta Solver for Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 129
9 more
- 2021NeuroLKH: Combining Deep Learning Model with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Heuristic for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 103
- 2020Gradient Estimation with Stochastic Softmax Trickscited by 67
- 2023Unsupervised Learning for Solving the Travelling Salesman Problemcited by 58
- 2025Fast T2T: Optimization Consistency Speeds Up Diffusion-Based Training-to-Testing Solving for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 45
- 2022What's Wrong with Deep Learning in Tree Search for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 37
- 2024Position: Rethinking Post-Hoc Search-Based Neural Approaches for Solving Large-Scale Traveling Salesman Problemscited by 24
- 2015An Experimental Evaluation of the Best-of-Many Christofides' Algorithm for the Traveling Salesman Problemcited by 3
- 2023Learning Lagrangian Multipliers for the Travelling Salesman Problemcited by 3
- 2026Graph Neural Networks are Heuristicscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.