mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Burst Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv 2607.11914 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2026cs.NE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central goal of current Spiking Neural Network (SNN) research is to improve their accuracy toward becoming low-power alternatives to Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). This work further argues that realizing this ambition requires improving not only accuracy but also robustness, defined as the ability to maintain correct predictions under input perturbations. We identify two key issues in existing SNN methods that undermine robustness. First, binary spiking activations can produce large activation-state changes under small perturbations. Second, the lack of effective weight constraints makes network outputs more sensitive to input variations. To this end, we propose Burst Spiking Neural Networks (BuSNNs), built upon Burst-enhanced Spiking Neurons (BSNs) and a Dynamic Weight Constraint (DWC) mechanism. BSNs incorporate burst firing to provide a graded spiking pattern. This spiking mechanism mitigates perturbation-induced transitions in activation states and thereby enhances robustness. DWC penalizes connection weights based on activation states, effectively reducing weight magnitudes and improving robustness while preserving accuracy. We provide theoretical analyses to support these robustness effects. Experimental results further show that, on smaller-scale benchmarks such as CIFAR-10, BuSNNs outperform both SNN and ANN counterparts in accuracy and robustness. On large-scale ImageNet, BuSNN with the MS ResNet-34 backbone further improves top-1 accuracy and corruption robustness over the corresponding SNN baseline by 3.18% and 2.66%, respectively. Despite using spike-based activations, BuSNNs surpass 4-bit activation-quantized ANN baselines and approach 8-bit ANN baselines on ImageNet. They also preserve SNNs' low-power advantage. This work studies the accuracy-robustness problem in SNNs, advancing their practical viability in robust and energy-efficient applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 104 references.

References · 10

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  4. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  5. 2024Direct Training High-Performance Deep Spiking Neural Networks: A Review of Theories and Methodscited by 25
  6. 2023A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptionscited by 21
  7. 2022Attacking the Spike: On the Transferability and Security of Spiking Neural Networks to Adversarial Examplescited by 13
  8. 2024Robust Stable Spiking Neural Networkscited by 11
  9. 2023Robustmix: Improving Robustness by Regularizing the Frequency Bias of Deep Netscited by 4
  10. 2024Parallel Spiking Unit for Efficient Training of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025S2NN: Sub-bit Spiking Neural Networks
  2. 2025Delays in Spiking Neural Networks: A State Space Model Approach
  3. 2022Efficient and Accurate Conversion of Spiking Neural Network with Burst Spikes
  4. 2026Learnable Burst Quantization for Expressive and Efficient Spiking Neural Networks
  5. 2025Towards Efficient and Accurate Spiking Neural Networks via Adaptive Bit Allocation
  6. 2025ReverB-SNN: Reversing Bit of the Weight and Activation for Spiking Neural Networks
  7. 2025Synergy Between the Strong and the Weak: Spiking Neural Networks are Inherently Self-Distillers
  8. 2023High-performance deep spiking neural networks with 0.3 spikes per neuron