Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attack Against Quantum Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) are a promising framework for quantum machine learning on near-term quantum devices, but their security risks remain insufficiently understood. Studies have shown that QNNs are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, yet existing quantum backdoors mostly rely on a fixed trigger shared by all poisoned inputs. This fixed-trigger design is a major weakness because many defenses detect or weaken the repeated patterns such triggers leave in data representations. Although input-aware dynamic backdoors have been studied in classical neural networks, transferring them to QNNs is difficult because quantum learning introduces new obstacles. In particular, measurement compresses the post-ansatz quantum state into a limited classical output, weakening supervision for a trigger generator, while individual density matrices fluctuate with the input and make per-sample contrastive learning unstable. To address these challenges, we propose Q-DIBA, the first input-aware dynamic backdoor attack for QNNs. Q-DIBA jointly trains a classical trigger generator and a victim QNN through a three-mode mini-batch strategy that supports clean behavior, attack activation, and trigger specificity. To provide stable quantum-level supervision, Q-DIBA introduces an ensemble density contrastive loss that operates on post-ansatz quantum states before measurement and contrasts mode-averaged density matrices rather than individual samples. Experiments on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST across multiple QNN architectures show that Q-DIBA achieves high clean accuracy, strong attack success, and high cross-trigger accuracy, demonstrating effectiveness, stealthiness, and input specificity. The attack also remains resilient against defenses including visual inspection, spectral-signature detection, and fine-tuning, suggesting that input-aware quantum backdoors are an important threat to secure QNN deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
10 of 27 references.
References · 10
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484
- 2020Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attackcited by 313
- 2019Variational Quantum Circuits for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 167
- 2020Dynamic Backdoor Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 151
- 2021QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuitscited by 98
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Quantum Variational Circuitscited by 77
- 2023QTrojan: A Circuit Backdoor Against Quantum Neural Networkscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Backdoor Attacks against Hybrid Classical-Quantum Neural Networks
- 2025SoK: Critical Evaluation of Quantum Machine Learning for Adversarial Robustness
- 2026Backdoor Threats in Variational Quantum Circuits: Taxonomy, Attacks, and Defenses ↗
- 2026CutBackdoor: A Circuit Cut Triggered Backdoor Attack on Variational Quantum Algorithms ↗
- 2026Can Quantum Federated Learning Withstand Circuit-Level Backdoors?
- 2025Quantum Properties Trojans (QuPTs) for Attacking Quantum Neural Networks
- 2023Quantum HyperNetworks: Training Binary Neural Networks in Quantum Superposition
- 2025Entangled Threats: A Unified Kill Chain Model for Quantum Machine Learning Security