mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How to Tame Grokking: Representation Geometry as a Control Signal

arXiv 2607.11666 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grokking is a phenomenon in which neural networks initially memorize training data and only later exhibit strong generalization after prolonged optimization. Despite extensive recent study, the factors influencing the emergence and timing of grokking remain incompletely understood. We investigate the relationship between representation geometry and delayed generalization. We find that dimensionality collapse consistently precedes the onset of grokking in all evaluated settings. Motivated by these observations, we introduce Geometric Dimensionality Regularization (GeomDR), a simple spectral regularizer that modifies the effective dimensionality of hidden representations during training. Across modular addition, modular division, and permutation composition tasks, GeomDR consistently alters grokking dynamics and can substantially accelerate the onset of generalization depending on the intervention schedule and target dimensionality. In several settings, grokking is accelerated by up to 52 times relative to standard AdamW training. Similar qualitative effects are observed in both multilayer perceptrons and transformers. Together, these results suggest that representation geometry can serve as an effective control signal for grokking and provide evidence that geometric interventions offer a practical approach for studying and influencing delayed generalization in neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

20 of 26 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  4. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  5. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
  6. 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
  7. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  8. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  9. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  10. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
  11. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
  12. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
8 more
  1. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 276
  2. 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 229
  3. 2021Neural Collapse Under MSE Loss: Proximity to and Dynamics on the Central Pathcited by 156
  4. 2022Neural Collapse: A Review on Modelling Principles and Generalizationcited by 95
  5. 2019Dimensionality compression and expansion in Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
  6. 2024Grokfast: Accelerated Grokking by Amplifying Slow Gradientscited by 38
  7. 2025Let Me Grok for You: Accelerating Grokking via Embedding Transfer from a Weaker Modelcited by 13
  8. 2023Bridging Lottery Ticket and Grokking: Understanding Grokking from Inner Structure of Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.