mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Empirical Study for Android-to-OpenHarmony GUI Test Migration

arXiv 2607.11245 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To reduce the substantial engineering effort required to test the corresponding applications from Android to OpenHarmony, migrating existing GUI test cases has become a critical problem. However, current research neither proposes solutions tailored for OpenHarmony nor provides a systematic evaluation of migration approaches on this system, leaving developers with limited empirical guidance in practice. In this paper, we present the first systematic empirical study of test migration from Android to OpenHarmony. Specifically, we first construct a dataset referred to as the ATH Benchmark, comprising 36 commercial applications with an average of over 9 billion downloads, along with 108 manually designed test cases. Second, we select two state-of-the-art test migration approaches (i.e., ReSPlay and ITeM) and adapt these two approaches to enable their execution on OpenHarmony. Third, we use the preceding infrastructure to evaluate these two approaches from three perspectives, including testing performance, root causes of failures, and the impact of OpenHarmony characteristics. Our results reveal that existing test migration approaches are less effective (15% success-rate on ReSPlay and 26% success-rate on ITeM) in Android-to-OpenHarmony scenarios. Through an in-depth analysis of failed cases, we identify that test performance is primarily hindered by OpenHarmony-specific characteristics, including technical architecture differences and unique ecosystem traits. Utilizing these findings, we propose an enhanced approach based on ITeM, referred as ITeM-HM, which incorporates specific OpenHarmony system features. As a result, ITeM-HM successfully achieves a 214% success-rate relative improvement over the original ITeM (from 26% to 81%).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 54 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023CoderEval: A Benchmark of Pragmatic Code Generation with Generative Pre-trained Modelscited by 28
  2. 2015Automated Test Input Generation for Android: Are We There Yet?cited by 10
  3. 2020Layout and Image Recognition Driving Cross-Platform Automated Mobile Testingcited by 4
  4. 2020FrUITeR: A Framework for Evaluating UI Test Reusecited by 3
  5. 2024Automated Test Transfer Across Android Apps Using Large Language Modelscited by 3
  6. 2023Software Engineering for OpenHarmony: A Research Roadmapcited by 2
  7. 2025ArkAnalyzer: The Static Analysis Framework for OpenHarmonycited by 2
  8. 2025ReuseDroid: A VLM-empowered Android UI Test Migrator Boosted by Active Feedbackcited by 2
  9. 2024GUI Test Migration via Abstraction and Concretizationcited by 1
  10. 2025HACMony: Automatically Detecting Hopping-related Audio-stream Conflict Issues on HarmonyOScited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.