mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Hidden Footprint: Making Storage a First-Class Metric for LLM Agent Evaluation

arXiv 2607.11149 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agent benchmarks measure task completion, reliability, and inference cost, but not the persistent data an agent run leaves on disk, including logs, context snapshots, checkpoints, and debug traces. We introduce AgentFootprint, a cross-framework benchmark of post-run agent storage footprint. Its serialization-aware metric suite measures total retention, channel composition, duplication, growth, compressibility, and conversation-history reconstructability. It addresses a measurement trap: naive byte-level measurement understates duplication by an order of magnitude because database paging and JSON escaping obscure repeated content. A fixed-trace control separates agent-generated logical volume from persistence-layer amplification: replaying the same trajectory through seven persisting frameworks yields a 6.7x spread. Under identical models, tools, and tasks, configurations with 100% accuracy differ by 15.7x in retained bytes, although their defaults support different recovery and audit capabilities. Three full-history configurations grow superlinearly on a repeated-observation stress task. Exported trajectories from 108 instance-normalized SWE-bench Verified submissions span three orders of magnitude per instance, with no detectable correlation with resolve rate. A content-addressed store reduces retention by 4.8x-32.7x while preserving every reconstructability score. These results establish persistent storage as a resource metric to report jointly with accuracy and reconstructability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

6 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026InfiAgent: An Infinite-Horizon Framework for General-Purpose Autonomous Agents6 Jan

Other references · 5

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  3. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  4. 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 145
  5. 2025Efficient Agents: Building Effective Agents While Reducing Costcited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Are We Ready For An Agent-Native Memory System?
  2. 2026Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents: Organization, Evolution, and Sustainability
  3. 2026Agent Memory: Characterization and System Implications of Stateful Long-Horizon Workloads
  4. 2026Akashic: A Low-Overhead LLM Inference Service with MemAttention
  5. 2026Persistent Memory in Multi-Agent LLM Inference: What It Costs, What It Buys, and When You Can Tell
  6. 2026MemForest: An Efficient Agent Memory System with Hierarchical Temporal Indexing
  7. 2026Persistent Context Graphs for Efficient Memory Compaction in LLM Agents
  8. 2026DynamicMCPBench: A Trace-Grounded, Effect-Scored Benchmark for LLM Agents over Live MCP Servers