M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training with quantized weights can reduce costs but often results in degraded accuracy, especially when optimization is carried out in low precision, without storing high-precision copies. We identify a key failure mode: under low precision, standard optimizers can get stuck and not make progress, especially at large weight magnitudes due to coarse mantissa resolution. To overcome this, multiplicative updates have been previously proposed, in place of additive updates in standard optimizers. While successful under extremely low precision, such as under the logarithmic number system, they suffer from failures near zero and across sign changes. The failure modes of additive and multiplicative updates are therefore complementary. To exploit this, we propose M+Adam, which combines both update types: additive steps handle sign changes and small magnitudes, while multiplicative steps ensure progress at large magnitudes when additive updates are zeroed out under rounding. We prove monotone descent for M+Adam under standard smoothness assumptions. Across LLaMA-style pretraining with 60M-1B models, 1x-8x Chinchilla budgets, and using only BF16, FP8, and FP4 master weights, M+Adam consistently improves low-precision training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2026.
Builds on
15 of 24 references.
References · 15
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
- 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 463
- 20218-bit Optimizers via Block-wise Quantizationcited by 403
- 2025Benchmarking Optimizers for Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 68
- 2024Scaling FP8 training to trillion-token LLMscited by 65
- 2023Memory Efficient Optimizers with 4-bit Statescited by 54
- 2024APOLLO: SGD-like Memory, AdamW-level Performancecited by 54
- 2025Quartet: Native FP4 Training Can Be Optimal for Large Language Modelscited by 39
- 2020Learning compositional functions via multiplicative weight updatescited by 20
- 2024LoQT: Low-Rank Adapters for Quantized Pretrainingcited by 12
- 2025Stochastic Rounding for LLM Training: Theory and Practicecited by 10
- 2021LNS-Madam: Low-Precision Training in Logarithmic Number System using Multiplicative Weight Updatecited by 7
3 more
- 2025TensorGRaD: Tensor Gradient Robust Decomposition for Memory-Efficient Neural Operator Trainingcited by 6
- 2025Log-Normal Multiplicative Dynamics for Stable Low-Precision Training of Large Networkscited by 2
- 2023Multiplicative update rules for accelerating deep learning training and increasing robustnesscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Optimizers under Floating-point Quantization
- 2025Pushing the Limits of Low-Bit Optimizers: A Focus on EMA Dynamics
- 2026Singularity-aware Optimization via Randomized Geometric Probing: Towards Stable Non-smooth Optimization
- 2025Convergence for Discrete Parameter Update Schemes
- 2026Beyond Dense Adam States: Adaptive Log-Space Quantization for Memory-Efficient Optimizers
- 2026Blog: Survey of Optimizers
- 2026ECO: Quantized Training without Full-Precision Master Weights
- 2024Custom Gradient Estimators are Straight-Through Estimators in Disguise