AutoNorm: Understanding Adaptive Normalization in Transformers through Differentiable Gating
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Normalization is a critical component for stabilizing Transformer training, yet the choice between static strategies such as Layer Normalization (LN) and adaptive alternatives remains largely task-dependent. In this paper, we investigate a key optimization challenge in differentiable normalization gating. Our experiments show that, on relatively stationary vision tasks, the high gradient variance introduced by Gumbel-Softmax gating can hinder convergence of the routing mechanism, causing learned gates to underperform simple random selection. In contrast, on non-stationary language modeling and classification tasks, sustained gating diversity enables the model to learn more effective layer-wise normalization policies. Motivated by these observations, we propose AutoNorm-S (Stabilized), a training strategy that mitigates optimization instability through a gate-freezing schedule. AutoNorm-S achieves competitive or improved performance across multiple benchmarks, outperforming adaptive normalization baselines on NLP datasets, including PTB and SST-2, while remaining competitive on standard vision benchmarks. These results suggest that decoupling normalization selection from optimization noise provides a practical and principled approach for adaptive normalization in Transformer architectures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2026.
Builds on
30 of 36 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
18 more
- 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
- 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
- 2019Dynamic Convolution: Attention over Convolution Kernelscited by 355
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 282
- 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 261
- 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 260
- 2019Fixup Initialization: Residual Learning Without Normalizationcited by 194
- 2022DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layerscited by 176
- 2025Transformers without Normalizationcited by 69
- 2018Differentiable Learning-to-Normalize via Switchable Normalizationcited by 33
- 2020Activate or Not: Learning Customized Activationcited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.