Structured Evidence Selection for Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Weakly supervised video anomaly detection relies solely on video-level labels for training, making it difficult to accurately localize anomalous events in complex scenes. In real-world videos, anomalous behaviors exhibit large variations in appearance and temporal duration, while scene appearance and action dynamics are often tightly entangled. Consequently, existing models tend to rely on scene-related statistical cues rather than true behavioral deviations, resulting in unstable detection performance. To address this challenge, we propose a Structured Evidence Selection framework (SESAD) that reformulates anomaly detection as a structured reasoning process over clip-level visual evidence. Instead of directly mapping aggregated features to anomaly scores, SESAD reorganizes clip representations into semantically structured candidate evidence and performs context-conditioned selection under scene and action constraints. This mechanism adaptively emphasizes anomaly-relevant semantics while suppressing scene interference, thereby alleviating semantic entanglement under weak supervision. Furthermore, we introduce a lightweight geometric discrimination module that constructs a dual-prototype structure in the embedding space, enabling anomaly decisions through relative geometric relations. Extensive experiments on UBnormal, ShanghaiTech, and UCF-Crime show that SESAD achieves 67.92, 97.99, and 88.46 AUC, respectively, while maintaining high computational efficiency and overall consistently stable anomaly discrimination.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.
Builds on
14 of 38 references.
References · 14
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2018Real-world Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videoscited by 577
- 2017Future Frame Prediction for Anomaly Detection -- A New Baselinecited by 391
- 2021Weakly-supervised Video Anomaly Detection with Robust Temporal Feature Magnitude Learningcited by 230
- 2023Generalized Video Anomaly Event Detection: Systematic Taxonomy and Comparison of Deep Modelscited by 59
- 2024Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection and Localization with Spatio-Temporal Promptscited by 40
- 2024Networking Systems for Video Anomaly Detection: A Tutorial and Surveycited by 21
- 2023Weakly-Supervised Video Anomaly Detection with Snippet Anomalous Attentioncited by 15
- 2026Watching, Reasoning, and Searching: A Video Deep Research Benchmark on Open Web for Agentic Video Reasoningcited by 14
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Video Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 11
- 2025HiProbe-VAD: Video Anomaly Detection via Hidden States Probing in Tuning-Free Multimodal LLMscited by 9
- 2025Learning to Tell Apart: Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection via Disentangled Semantic Alignmentcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Context-structured Video Anomaly Detection with Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026LATERN: Test-Time Context-Aware Explainable Video Anomaly Detection
- 2026Beyond Hazard Resemblance: Contrastive Event Adjudication for Training-Free Video Anomaly Detection
- 2026MuST-VAD: Mutual Structured Learning for Video Anomaly Detection
- 2026Localizing to Debias: A Patch-Level Benchmark and Baseline for Weakly Supervised Spatial Anomaly Detection
- 2026Anomaly-Guided Observation and Two-Level Semantic Feedback for Training-Free Video Anomaly Analysis
- 2025Mixture of Experts Guided by Gaussian Splatters Matters: A new Approach to Weakly-Supervised Video Anomaly Detection
- 2026PARSEE-VAD: Efficient Training-Free Online Video Anomaly Detection via Proposition-Aware Reasoning and Streaming Evidence Escalation