mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Language Re-generation: An investigation into information locality effects on reconstruction

arXiv 2607.10268 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Information locality, the tendency for syntactically related words to appear close together, shapes both human language processing and language model learning. While prior work has examined whether language models can acquire impossible languages, it remains unclear whether they can recover natural language from such input and what this reveals about their inductive biases. We address this by complementing learnability-based approaches with a reconstruction framework: fine-tuning GPT-2 models pre-trained on impossible languages to reconstruct natural English from three perturbation types. Our findings show that the recovered structures exhibit shorter dependency lengths than the original text, mirroring the locality preference observed in unconstrained language model generation and providing a quantitative signature of an architectural bias that learnability experiments alone do not reveal. Recovery difficulty increases with the degree of locality disruption. Structural recovery (dependency Triple F1) dissociates from surface recovery (Exact Match), while fluency dissociates from faithful reconstruction under global shuffling. Sentence length further modulates performance: longer sentences facilitate recovery when local structure is preserved but lead to complete collapse under global shuffling. Finally, recovery difficulty tracks learnability difficulty across perturbation types, suggesting that information locality is the shared constraint governing both.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 38 references.

References · 13

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 288
  4. 2022Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchycited by 217
  5. 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
  6. 2018Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Contextcited by 113
  7. 2023Call for Papers -- The BabyLM Challenge: Sample-efficient pretraining on a developmentally plausible corpuscited by 62
  8. 2020How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?cited by 51
  9. 2018The Importance of Being Recurrent for Modeling Hierarchical Structurecited by 42
  10. 2022Word Order Does Matter (And Shuffled Language Models Know It)cited by 32
  11. 2025Can Language Models Learn Typologically Implausible Languages?cited by 23
  12. 2025Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Modelscited by 14
1 more
  1. 2025Biasless Language Models Learn Unnaturally: How LLMs Fail to Distinguish the Possible from the Impossiblecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.