mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quota Marketplace: Dynamic Pricing for Efficient Allocation of ML Training Resources

arXiv 2607.09802 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.GTcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The escalating demand for Machine Learning (ML) training resources in recent years has resulted in a substantial gap between the high demand and the available supply. Efficient allocation of these scarce and expensive resources is crucial for organizations to maximize their return on investment. Existing resource allocation mechanisms, like Karma [OSDI'23], are designed to guarantee Pareto efficiency and max-min fairness in settings with dynamic (time-varying) user demands, but fail to preserve these key properties in the presence of demands with heterogeneous values. Given the ubiquity and inevitability of heterogeneity in organizational values of different workloads, effective resource allocation policies must accommodate these variations. In this paper, we describe the design, implementation, deployment, and theoretical analysis of Quota Marketplace, a market-based mechanism to efficiently allocate ML training chips (like GPUs), explicitly addressing scenarios with demands of heterogeneous value. We detail the implementation of this mechanism within Google and present metrics that demonstrate its impact. We also discuss many business-critical requirements that the Quota Marketplace handles quite effectively, and document the gains and opportunities it has unlocked. We establish theoretically how this market-based approach achieves the essential properties of Pareto efficiency and max-min fairness by allowing the users to express the value of their workloads and enabling dynamic resource pricing based on supply and demand fluctuations. Ultimately, the market facilitates resource allocation that aligns with organizational priorities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

Builds on

3 of 31 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Heterogeneity-Aware Cluster Scheduling Policies for Deep Learning Workloadscited by 56
  2. 2021Solving Large-Scale Granular Resource Allocation Problems Efficiently with POPcited by 13
  3. 2016A Field Guide to Personalized Reserve Pricescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.