Q-Score: A Quantum-Native Scoring Function for Molecular Docking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Molecular docking predicts how a small molecule binds to a protein and is a key bottleneck in drug discovery. Classical scoring functions sum empirical pairwise contacts, blind to quantum-mechanical effects like orbital charge transfer that govern binding specificity. We introduce Q-Score, encoding GNN-predicted orbital donor-acceptor energies into a weighted graph and scoring binding by solving a maximum-weight vertex clique problem via Digitized-Counterdiabatic QAOA. Each interaction anchor maps to one qubit and compatibility constraints become edges. Across 11 protein targets, DC-QAOA recovers the exact optimum on 8 at 10 qubits. On 1000 AI-generated molecules, Q-Score is orthogonal to classical scoring with Spearman rho of 0.05, driven by orbital quality with rho of 0.90, and free of molecular-weight bias, enriching for strong orbital interactions at twice the random rate. DC-QAOA achieves a mean approximation ratio of 0.94 with 52 percent exact. Execution of 1000 circuits on IBM Eagle confirms 6-qubit solvability on NISQ hardware.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
6 of 35 references.
References · 6
- 2020GEOM: Energy-annotated molecular conformations for property prediction and molecular generationcited by 243
- 2013Ising formulations of many NP problemscited by 207
- 2022Pocket2Mol: Efficient Molecular Sampling Based on 3D Protein Pocketscited by 183
- 2019A Purely Algebraic Justification of the Kabsch-Umeyama Algorithmcited by 24
- 2024Advancing Molecular Machine Learning Representations with Stereoelectronics-Infused Molecular Graphscited by 2
- 2026Beyond Affinity: A Benchmark of 1D, 2D, and 3D Methods Reveals Critical Trade-offs in Structure-Based Drug Designcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.