mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Schedule-Free Methods in Nonconvex Optimization: Rate Guarantees and Escaping Saddles

arXiv 2607.09167 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2026cs.LG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Schedule-Free methods have attracted growing interest for alleviating the burden of designing and tuning a learning rate scheduler, while matching and sometimes even outperforming optimizers with tuned schedulers. Despite their strong empirical results, their convergence theory in nonconvex optimization, where modern machine learning objectives typically arise, has remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we provide worst-case analyses of Schedule-Free gradient descent and Schedule-Free stochastic gradient descent, in their standard form and without auxiliary modifications or restrictive conditions, for smooth but possibly nonconvex objectives. Based on a Lyapunov analysis derived from the continuous-time limiting ordinary differential equation associated with these methods, we show that Schedule-Free gradient descent and Schedule-Free stochastic gradient descent achieve the optimal worst-case convergence rates attainable among first-order methods. We further formulate Schedule-Free gradient descent as a nonautonomous dynamical system and prove strict-saddle avoidance under an arbitrarily small one-time perturbation. These theoretical results provide a better understanding of the strong performance that Schedule-Free methods demonstrate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

Builds on

3 of 34 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023Benchmarking Neural Network Training Algorithmscited by 52
  2. 2020Momentum via Primal Averaging: Theoretical Insights and Learning Rate Schedules for Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 21
  3. 2026A non-autonomous center-stable set theorem for saddle avoidance in optimizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.