mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interval Certifications for Multilayered Perceptrons via Lattice Traversal

arXiv 2607.08773 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work we present a rigorous theoretical framework to a foundational problem of AI safety, namely adversarial robustness. In particular, we show that the adversarial robustness problem can be reduced to a lattice traversal problem. Each element of this lattice corresponds to an interval, i.e., an axis-aligned hyper-rectangle, containing an input point x. Consider a multilayered perceptron classifier (MLP). An interval I constitutes a sound certification if x ∈ I and x can be freely perturbed in I without changing the MLP's prediction. Complementarily, an interval I constitutes a complete certification if x ∈ I and when x moves outside of I the MLP's prediction is guaranteed to change. While the sound certification problem corresponds to the well-studied adversarial robustness, complete certifications have not been examined in the literature. We develop lattice traversal operators, which we apply in a refine & verify iterative scheme. Using formal MLP verifiers, sound maximality and complete minimality are guaranteed. Moreover, we examine objective optimization problems. There we discover some interesting asymmetries. For complete certifications, the minimum solution is obtained in polynomial oracle calls. This does not hold for sound certifications, where we prove strong intractability results. Additionally, we examine optimization problems in symmetric intervals (i.e., ℓ_∞-spheres), where we provide logarithmic algorithms. Finally, we present an empirical evaluation, using the novel ParallelepipedoNN system.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  8. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  9. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  10. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  11. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
  12. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 204
10 more
  1. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  2. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 126
  3. 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 124
  4. 2017Dipole: Diagnosis Prediction in Healthcare via Attention-based Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 114
  5. 2024Marabou 2.0: A Versatile Formal Analyzer of Neural Networkscited by 81
  6. 2022Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspectivecited by 41
  7. 2023Delivering Inflated Explanationscited by 16
  8. 2025Collaborative Retrieval for Large Language Model-based Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 16
  9. 2024Autonomous Driving Small-Scale Cars: A Survey of Recent Developmentcited by 6
  10. 2021Faster Algorithms for Largest Empty Rectangles and Boxescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.