mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Steering Neural Network Training through Interpretable Constraints Based on Partial Dependence

arXiv 2607.08641 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the last few years, there has been an increased interest in making machine learning models more interpretable. Although a great deal of effort goes into developing techniques for interpreting the interactions learned by a given model, fewer studies focus on assessing the quality of such explanations. Even fewer focus on how to adjust the model to produce explanations faithful to prior knowledge, a process known as explanation-guided learning. Furthermore, most approaches in this area focus on classification problems and usually assume prior knowledge about which input features or regions are most important. In this work, we introduce a new approach to steering neural networks based on partial dependence, such that their average response to certain features aligns with specific functional domain knowledge about the problem. We empirically demonstrate on a range of regression problems, including dynamical systems forecasting, that models whose training has been controlled using our method perform better than unconstrained models and are more data-efficient. Moreover, we highlight that interpretations obtained from the former actually align with the user-provided knowledge, whereas those obtained from the latter do not.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,750
  4. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 938
  5. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  6. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 408
  7. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
  8. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
  9. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
  10. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
  11. 2020Augmenting Physical Models with Deep Networks for Complex Dynamics Forecastingcited by 94
  12. 2019Unconstrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 91
12 more
  1. 2019Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classificationcited by 68
  2. 2021Physics-Integrated Variational Autoencoders for Robust and Interpretable Generative Modelingcited by 59
  3. 2021Integrating Expert ODEs into Neural ODEs: Pharmacology and Disease Progressioncited by 48
  4. 2016Rationale-Augmented Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classificationcited by 39
  5. 2022Visual correspondence-based explanations improve AI robustness and human-AI team accuracycited by 38
  6. 2022Going Beyond XAI: A Systematic Survey for Explanation-Guided Learningcited by 35
  7. 2022Aligning Eyes between Humans and Deep Neural Network through Interactive Attention Alignmentcited by 27
  8. 2022RES: A Robust Framework for Guiding Visual Explanationcited by 22
  9. 2020Linearly Constrained Neural Networkscited by 18
  10. 2019Regional Tree Regularization for Interpretability in Black Box Modelscited by 14
  11. 2023Structured Neural Networks for Density Estimation and Causal Inferencecited by 13
  12. 2023Hybrid additive modeling with partial dependence for supervised regression and dynamical systems forecastingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.