mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A law of robustness for two-layer neural networks with arbitrary weights

arXiv 2607.07778 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2026cs.LG math.PR stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bubeck, Li and Nagaraj conjectured that, for generic data, any two-layer neural network with m neurons that fits n noisy labels must have Lipschitz constant at least of order √n/m, with no restriction on the size of the weights. Bubeck and Sellke proved a universal version of this law for Lipschitz-parameterized classes, but under a polynomial bound on the parameters; at depth three that boundedness hypothesis is genuinely necessary. The two-layer unbounded-weight case requires a different argument. We prove the conjectured law, up to one logarithmic factor, for every continuous piecewise-linear activation, in particular for ReLU networks. For data drawn uniformly from mathbbSd-1, d≥3, or from N(0,Id/d), labels in [-1,1] with noise level σ2>0, and any width-m two-layer network with arbitrary real weights, biases and affine skip connection, fitting the data varepsilon below the noise floor forces Lip(f)≥ c,varepsilon√n/(bar mlog(Cbar m nd/varepsilon)), bar m=(K-1)m+1, with high probability. A realized-kink-count version holds on the same event: every realized two-layer piecewise-linear function with k(f)≤ n distinct kink hyperplanes obeys the bound with bar m replaced by k(f)+1, irrespective of how many redundant hidden units parameterize it. The proof replaces parameter-space covering, impossible for unbounded weights, by a function-space covering. The central deterministic ingredient is a rigidity lemma: on B2, and on mathbbSd-1 for d≥3, the coefficient of each canonical kink is controlled by the Lipschitz constant of the realized function, because kinks on distinct hyperplanes cannot cancel at generic points. Rigidity genuinely fails at d=2, and an explicit two-layer ReLU interpolant with O(1) Lipschitz constant at width 2n matches the law at the overparameterized endpoint.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 253
  2. 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
  3. 2020A law of robustness for two-layers neural networkscited by 54
  4. 2022A Law of Robustness beyond Isoperimetrycited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.