mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SynthAVE: Scalable Synthetic Labeling for E-Commerce with LLM-Arena Validation

arXiv 2607.07469 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for e-commerce attribute extraction requires labeled data representative across thousands of product types, attributes, and multiple languages. This combinatorial scale translates to millions of annotations, rendering human labeling prohibitively costly. While recent work has demonstrated synthetic label generation using LLMs, deploying such approaches at industrial scale requires integrated quality control mechanisms. We present SynthAVE, a large-scale benchmark for attribute-value verification spanning 12,726 products across 229 product types, 792 attributes, and 4 languages (Spanish, French, Italian, German). To validate synthetic labels at scale, we introduce a multi-LLM arena framework where each sample is evaluated by 21 judge configurations (7 model families × 3 prompts), with final labels determined via majority voting; disagreements with the synthetic label are expert-adjudicated and agreement cases are audited on a stratified sample. The majority vote ensemble agrees with expert labels at Cohen's kappa = 0.92 (95.0% agreement), while individual judges agree with one another only moderately (Fleiss' kappa = 0.76)--by design, since we select for diversity. This demonstrates that diverse models with varying individual judgments aggregate into highly reliable predictions, enabling cost-effective validation at scale while concentrating expert effort on the cases where it changes the label. We estimate the resulting label quality at 97.9%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

Builds on

2 of 32 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
  2. 2026Nine Judges, Two Effective Votes: Correlated Errors Undermine LLM Evaluation Panelscited by 26

Built on by

Not cited yet.