mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Naming the Concepts Classifiers Rely On: Language-Anchored Decomposition for Faithful Explanation

arXiv 2607.07264 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are widely deployed in high-stakes visual applications where interpretability is critical, yet existing explanations face a trade-off: post-hoc concept methods recover factors that are faithful to a model's behavior but unnamed, while naming and by-design methods attach human-readable concepts only by retraining or altering the classifier. We propose Language-Anchored Decomposition (LAD), a post-hoc framework that delivers concepts which are simultaneously named, faithful, and obtained without modifying the model. For each class, a large language model proposes a concept vocabulary that CLIP-based similarity maps localize across image regions. Inverting standard non-negative matrix factorization, LAD fixes these language-grounded maps as the coefficient matrix and learns only a concept basis that reconstructs the frozen encoder's activations, so naming becomes a structural constraint and the model's own feature geometry determines which concepts are retained. Removing this anchor preserves accuracy but collapses attribution faithfulness. Across natural-image, scene, and medical-imaging benchmarks, LAD produces spatially precise explanations that are decision-relevant under both concept insertion and deletion, while uniquely providing stable, human-interpretable concept names.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 27 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  6. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  7. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  8. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  9. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 282
  10. 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMscited by 215
  11. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  12. 2022CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networkscited by 144
10 more
  1. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
  2. 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
  3. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  4. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 87
  5. 2020General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Modelscited by 74
  6. 2019Interpretability Beyond Classification Output: Semantic Bottleneck Networkscited by 49
  7. 2023Learning Bottleneck Concepts in Image Classificationcited by 49
  8. 2025Show and Tell: Visually Explainable Deep Neural Nets via Spatially-Aware Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 12
  9. 2022Explaining Deep Convolutional Neural Networks via Latent Visual-Semantic Filter Attentioncited by 11
  10. 2025FACE: Faithful Automatic Concept Extractioncited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.