Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Model Responses: A Multi-Factor Scoring System
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in linguistic tasks underscores an urgent need for comprehensive evaluation of their response quality. Prevailing methods, often confined to singular dimensions, fall short of capturing the full spectrum of model capabilities. This study introduces a multifactor scoring paradigm, integrating accuracy, conciseness, factual consistency, readability, and coherence, complemented by a graphical user interface (GUI) for visualizing outcomes. Evaluations on the TruthfulQA dataset unveil mainstream LLMs' strengths in reasoning tasks (peaking at a composite score of 0.6104) alongside pervasive limitations in navigating complex facts and ambiguities. Transcending the narrow lens of traditional metrics, this framework offers a transparent, adaptable avenue to illuminate model potential and deficiencies. Though presently focused on English tasks, its horizons beckon toward multilingual domains. This work carves a novel path for knowledge engineering and model refinement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation
- 2024Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey
- 2026An Interpretable and Scalable Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models
- 2024metabench -- A Sparse Benchmark of Reasoning and Knowledge in Large Language Models
- 2024Enhancing LLM Evaluations: The Garbling Trick
- 2025Domain Specific Benchmarks for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Position: On the Methodological Pitfalls of Evaluating Base LLMs for Reasoning
- 2023Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance