mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Open-Ended Scenario Reasoning for Specialist Model Adaptation

arXiv 2607.06625 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Process industries have accumulated validated specialist models, yet sensor drift, feedstock variation, and regime switching cause these models to degrade systematically in new scenarios. Collecting new labeled data and retraining is costly, while continuing with the original model incurs persistent bias. Existing adaptation methods require modifying model parameters with sufficient labeled data, making rapid response on deployed systems difficult. Using LLMs as direct predictors risks hallucinations and uncontrollable outputs. Such predictors also cannot incorporate unstructured scenario knowledge from the field. To address these limitations, this article proposes Reasoning-Driven Open Adaptation for Specialist Models (ROAM), a framework that uses LLM world knowledge and reasoning to adapt frozen specialist models to unseen scenarios without retraining. ROAM confines all corrections to a low-dimensional, semantically interpretable latent space. LLM-generated scenario judgments and online observations are fused under a unified probabilistic framework. A risk-constrained mechanism suppresses corrections under unreliable LLM evidence or abrupt scenario shifts and falls back to the original frozen model when evidence is insufficient. Experiments on a mineral thickening process and the public IndPenSim penicillin fermentation dataset show that ROAM reduces MAE by over 20% in major shift settings such as hidden shifts with only 839 additional parameters and under 0.02,ms per-step overhead. These results indicate that LLM reasoning can be turned into a conservative adaptation signal for industrial models already in service.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 39 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  4. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  6. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
  7. 2024Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 168
  8. 2025Spatio-Temporal Consistent Soft Sensor Modeling and Monitoring of Thermal Power Plants based on Physical Knowledgecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Probabilistic Framework for LLM-Based Model Discovery
  2. 2026LLM Agents Perform Controlled Experiments Using Simulation Models
  3. 2025MiGrATe: Mixed-Policy GRPO for Adaptation at Test-Time
  4. 2026RAG or Learning? Understanding the Limits of LLM Adaptation under Continuous Knowledge Drift in the Real World
  5. 2026The Capability Frontier: Benchmarks Miss 82% of Model Performance
  6. 2024Knowledge Distillation Using Frontier Open-source LLMs: Generalizability and the Role of Synthetic Data
  7. 2026LLM sequential decision making under uncertainty in biochemical domains
  8. 2025Knowledge Updating? No More Model Editing! Just Selective Contextual Reasoning