Fingerprint, Not Blueprint: How Positional Schemes Set the Default Spectral Algebra of Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The pre-softmax score of an attention head is a bilinear form score(i,j) = xiT M xj in a learned operator M = WqT Wk. Because M is generally non-symmetric, hence non-normal, it has a complex eigenspectrum and non-orthogonal eigenvectors, the regime where non-Hermitian and random-matrix tools apply. We ask what this spectrum encodes, at three levels for previous-token and induction circuits. Statically, across seven pretrained models spanning three positional schemes, the strongest previous-token heads are spectrally rotational under RoPE and non-rotational, or content-like, where position enters outside QK (learned-absolute and ALiBi); the model-level separation is perfect at every top-k examined (exact permutation p=0.029), and zeroing the per-frequency RoPE phase Im(Mt) eliminates induction on a pre-identified previous-token head in all three RoPE models. Dynamically, over public Pythia checkpoints every head originates at the random-matrix (Ginibre) null; the rotational signature emerges with the behavior, not before it, and the population-median suppression that yields the final profile follows circuit formation, so the profile is a consolidated fingerprint, not a precursor. Causally, and at toy scale, no spectral channel is necessary: constrained two-layer training reroutes around every ban with capability intact, albeit at a significant formation delay (four pre-registered contrasts, qBH <= 0.016). The cost structure exposes each scheme's default: imposing symmetry slows learned-absolute models by a factor of 2.9, whereas a RoPE head with a fully symmetric static M still routes directionally via the phase channel, impossible under absolute positions. Within the settings examined, the positional scheme sets the default spectral algebra of an attention head's solution: a fingerprint sculpted after function, not a hard constraint upon it.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 22 references.
References · 16
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
- 2023Birth of a Transformer: A Memory Viewpointcited by 154
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
- 2023The mechanistic basis of data dependence and abrupt learning in an in-context classification taskcited by 115
- 2024Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?cited by 111
- 2024What needs to go right for an induction head? A mechanistic study of in-context learning circuits and their formationcited by 86
- 2024LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scalecited by 60
- 2025The underlying structures of self-attention: symmetry, directionality, and emergent dynamics in Transformer trainingcited by 9
- 2025Decoupling Positional and Symbolic Attention Behavior in Transformerscited by 6
4 more
- 2024Symmetric Dot-Product Attention for Efficient Training of BERT Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026Dissecting Multimodal In-Context Learning: Modality Asymmetries and Circuit Dynamics in modern Transformerscited by 5
- 2026Dynamics of the Transformer Residual Stream: Coupling Spectral Geometry to Network Topologycited by 5
- 2026The Routing and Filtering Structure of Attentioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.