mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Doomed from the Start: Early Abort of LLM Agent Episodes via a Recall-Controlled Probe Cascade

arXiv 2607.06503 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents often waste inference compute by continuing multi-step trajectories that are already doomed to fail. We study early failure prediction and inference-time early stopping for LLM agents using hidden-state probes. Lightweight linear probes on internal activations predict eventual task failure from the first interaction round, substantially earlier than agent-monitoring methods based only on observable behavior. We turn this signal into a recall-controlled abort cascade for reducing LLM agent inference costs. The cascade applies a distribution-free calibrated failure detector at each early interaction round and jointly optimizes per-round recall budgets. This design ensures that eventually successful episodes survive all early-stopping gates at a user-specified global recall rate. After selection, the cascade is frozen and certified on independent data, providing an exact post-selection recall guarantee. We evaluate the method on TextCraft and WebShop with Qwen-2.5-7B, Llama-3.2-3B, and Qwen3-1.7B. The proposed LLM agent early-stopping cascade outperforms the best single-gate baseline in every model-environment pair, saving 1.5-8.8 times more compute at a 90% recall target. Achieved recall remains within one standard deviation of its target in all 24 configurations. The strongest settings reduce generated tokens by 60.2% on TextCraft and 54.9% on WebShop at 90% recall, while retaining savings of 45.0% and 41.5% at 95% recall. Behavior-only monitoring is consistently weaker, and adding behavioral features to hidden-state probes provides no further gain. We also characterize the sample complexity required to certify high-recall early-stopping policies. The code will be released soon.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 45 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.

Builds on

45 of 63 references.

References · 45

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  3. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  5. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  6. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
  7. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  8. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
  9. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  10. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 338
  11. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
  12. 2021Distribution-Free, Risk-Controlling Prediction Setscited by 278
33 more
  1. 2021Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Controlcited by 256
  2. 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
  3. 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 230
  4. 2023ADaPT: As-Needed Decomposition and Planning with Language Modelscited by 172
  5. 2024Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improvecited by 162
  6. 2025Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verificationcited by 154
  7. 2024Language Models with Conformal Factuality Guaranteescited by 128
  8. 2024AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environmentscited by 120
  9. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failurescited by 118
  10. 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMscited by 111
  11. 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoningcited by 105
  12. 2024Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methodscited by 91
  13. 2024LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Querycited by 80
  14. 2023EE-LLM: Large-Scale Training and Inference of Early-Exit Large Language Models with 3D Parallelismcited by 69
  15. 2024Adaptive Inference-Time Compute: LLMs Can Predict if They Can Do Better, Even Mid-Generationcited by 64
  16. 2026AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectoriescited by 53
  17. 2025Failure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policiescited by 36
  18. 2025Knowing Before Saying: LLM Representations Encode Information About Chain-of-Thought Success Before Completioncited by 22
  19. 2025Cost-Saving LLM Cascades with Early Abstentioncited by 14
  20. 2026BAGEN: Are LLM Agents Budget-Aware?cited by 12
  21. 2025Runaway is Ashamed, But Helpful: On the Early-Exit Behavior of Large Language Model-based Agents in Embodied Environmentscited by 11
  22. 2026When Agents Commit Too Soon: Diagnosing Premature Commitment in LLM Agentscited by 9
  23. 2025Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstructioncited by 6
  24. 2026Knowing When to Quit: A Principled Framework for Dynamic Abstention in LLM Reasoningcited by 6
  25. 2026AgentStop: Terminating Local AI Agents Early to Save Energy in Consumer Devicescited by 5
  26. 2026Early Diagnosis of Wasted Computation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems via Failure-Aware Observabilitycited by 4
  27. 2026GRADE: Graph Representation of LLM Agent Dependency and Executioncited by 4
  28. 2026Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswapcited by 3
  29. 2026From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agentscited by 3
  30. 2026When Evidence is Sparse: Weakly Supervised Early Failure Alerting in Dialogs and LLM-Agent Trajectoriescited by 3
  31. 2026TRACE: Trajectory Reasoning through Adaptive Cross-Step Evidence Aggregation for LLM Agentscited by 3
  32. 2026Signals: Trajectory Sampling and Triage for Agentic Interactionscited by 2
  33. 2026Semantic Early-Stopping for Iterative LLM Agent Loopscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Chronicle: Cut-Point Replay for Regression Testing of LLM Agents
  2. 2026Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging Frontiers
  3. 2026Weighted Memory Tree: Remembering What Matters for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  4. 2026Stop When Memory Suffices: Evidence-Conditioned Progressive Execution for LLM Agents
  5. 2025Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions
  6. 2025How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behavior
  7. 2026Persistent Memory in Multi-Agent LLM Inference: What It Costs, What It Buys, and When You Can Tell
  8. 2026PrefixGuard: From LLM-Agent Traces to Online Failure-Warning Monitors