mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GEM-Occ: From Visual Geometry Evidence to Embodied Semantic Occupancy Memory

arXiv 2607.05543 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.RO cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Embodied agents exploring indoor environments require reliable semantic occupancy memory that persists across observations and revisits. Building such memory is challenging because each observation provides incomplete and uncertain geometric and semantic evidence. We introduce GEM-Occ, a Gaussian Evidence Memory framework that consolidates evidence accumulated over time into persistent semantic occupancy memory. Local predictions are converted into occupied semantic Gaussians and free-space ray evidence. Confidence- and visibility-aware causal updates integrate supporting observations, suppress occupancy contradicted by observed free space, and preserve previously observed structures through occlusion. A hierarchical memory organization supports continued mapping and efficient queries across connected indoor spaces. To evaluate this capability, we introduce HIOcc, a unified benchmark for embodied semantic occupancy memory. HIOcc establishes a shared semantic label space and evaluation framework spanning local prediction, room-level online mapping, and building-level mapping, while accommodating perspective and panoramic observations. Experiments on HIOcc demonstrate that GEM-Occ outperforms existing methods, enabling accurate semantic occupancy prediction and consistent online mapping across spatial scales with efficient memory usage and fast occupancy queries.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 21 references.

References · 18

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  5. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  7. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  9. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  10. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  11. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
  12. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 940
6 more
  1. 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 332
  2. 2025Agent Learning via Early Experiencecited by 85
  3. 2026Expanding the Capabilities of Reinforcement Learning via Text Feedbackcited by 53
  4. 2024WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedbackcited by 31
  5. 2023Safer-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Automated Preference Datacited by 27
  6. 2025Cogito, Ergo Ludo: An Agent that Learns to Play by Reasoning and Planningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.