mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

InFlux++: Real and Synthetic Data for Estimating Dynamic Camera Intrinsics

arXiv 2607.05389 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Camera intrinsics are vital for recovering 3D structure from 2D video. However, most 3D algorithms assume fixed intrinsics throughout a video, an assumption that often fails for real-world in-the-wild videos. Consequently, estimating per-frame intrinsics from RGB images is critical for making 3D methods robust to videos with dynamic intrinsics. InFlux previously advanced this research direction by establishing the first real-world benchmark with per-frame ground truth intrinsics for dynamic intrinsics videos. Nevertheless, existing methods remain inaccurate due to two obstacles: (i) training data is scarce and lacks intrinsics diversity; and (ii) benchmarks, including InFlux, have limited scene and camera motion diversity, making it difficult to properly evaluate methods. To address both gaps, we present InFlux++, consisting of two components. InFlux++ Synth is a large-scale procedurally generated synthetic video dataset with 441K+ annotated frames from 1841 high-resolution videos, providing accurate per-frame ground truth intrinsics for training dynamic intrinsics prediction models; a subset also includes per-frame pose, depth, and normals. The videos feature rich intrinsics diversity through changes in camera zoom and focus, as well as dynamic objects and realistic rendering effects such as lens distortion and defocus blur. InFlux++ Real is a large-scale real-world benchmark that extends InFlux with 514K+ newly captured frames across 334 high-resolution videos, spanning a wider range of scenes and camera motions. Finetuning existing intrinsics prediction methods on InFlux++ Synth consistently improves focal length estimation across both InFlux++ Real and InFlux, suggesting that synthetic supervision is promising for RGB-based intrinsics prediction. For the dataset, benchmark, code, videos, submission instructions, and live leaderboard, please visit https://influx.cs.princeton.edu/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

27 of 36 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  5. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  6. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  7. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  8. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  9. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
  10. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
  11. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 371
  12. 2020Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep Learningcited by 297
15 more
  1. 2019Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Datacited by 203
  2. 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
  3. 2025TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Datacited by 176
  4. 2026TabICLv2: A better, faster, scalable, and open tabular foundation modelcited by 144
  5. 2024TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensemblingcited by 113
  6. 2024Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Datacited by 92
  7. 2022Packed-Ensembles for Efficient Uncertainty Estimationcited by 49
  8. 2022Revisiting Pretraining Objectives for Tabular Deep Learningcited by 43
  9. 2024TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning Benchmarkscited by 33
  10. 2023TANGOS: Regularizing Tabular Neural Networks through Gradient Orthogonalization and Specializationcited by 32
  11. 2022FiLM-Ensemble: Probabilistic Deep Learning via Feature-wise Linear Modulationcited by 24
  12. 2022Hyperparameter Sensitivity in Deep Outlier Detection: Analysis and a Scalable Hyper-Ensemble Solutioncited by 24
  13. 2023Joint Training of Deep Ensembles Fails Due to Learner Collusioncited by 23
  14. 2023GRANDE: Gradient-Based Decision Tree Ensembles for Tabular Datacited by 11
  15. 2026Benchmarking Optimizers for MLPs in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.