mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fitted Occupancy-Ratio Evaluation without Bellman Completeness

arXiv 2607.05375 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Occupancy ratios correct distribution shift in offline reinforcement learning and are central to off-policy evaluation. Existing primal-dual and minimax methods typically estimate these ratios by enforcing occupancy-balance moments over a critic class. We propose fitted occupancy-ratio evaluation (FORE), a fitted fixed-point method that characterizes the discounted occupancy ratio through an adjoint Bellman recursion. At each iteration, FORE solves a single-level density-ratio objective on one-step-transition data, thereby projecting the adjoint Bellman image onto a log-ratio class in Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Unlike analyses of fitted Q-evaluation, which typically require value-function realizability together with Bellman completeness or projected-operator stability, our central approximation condition is just realizability of the discounted occupancy ratio itself. Under this condition, the population KL-projected recursion contracts in relative entropy toward the true ratio by virtue of the adjoint Bellman operator being a KL-contraction. For the empirical recursion, we establish finite-sample regret bounds that yield convergence in KL up to approximation error and a statistical error governed by the complexity of the ratio hypothesis class. When full coverage fails, we introduce coverage-stopped FORE, which targets the discounted occupancy accumulated before the first uncovered state-action pair and yields a conservative lower bound on target-policy value for nonnegative rewards. The fitted ratio supports direct value estimation by reward reweighting, occupancy-weighted fitted Q-evaluation, and doubly robust estimation that combines the fitted ratio with a fitted Q-function. Together, these results identify discounted occupancy-ratio realizability as a sufficient condition for offline policy evaluation without any completeness assumptions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Soft Fitted Q-Iteration without Bellman Completeness: Occupancy Reweighting and Temperature Annealing
  2. 2022Bellman Residual Orthogonalization for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Offline RL with Smooth OOD Generalization in Convex Hull and its Neighborhood
  4. 2021Projected State-action Balancing Weights for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrability
  6. 2020Confounding-Robust Policy Evaluation in Infinite-Horizon Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Implicit Constraint-Aware Off-Policy Correction for Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025Bellman Calibration for V-Learning in Offline Reinforcement Learning