mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Shape Over Intensity: Directional Topological Encoding for False Positive Reduction in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection

arXiv 2607.05317 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated detection of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) from CT angiography (CTA) is severely hindered by high false-positive rates. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) rely on local pixel intensities, causing systematic confusion between saccular aneurysms and vascular bifurcations - a problem especially acute for small lesions (<3 mm), where detection sensitivity falls below 60%. We propose a plug-and-play, topology-aware false-positive reduction framework evaluating the Smooth Euler Characteristic Transform (SECT) - a directional representation encoding global 3D vascular geometry independently of intensity - against persistence-based summaries (Persistence Images and Landscapes), tested on a stratified subset of the RSNA 2025 dataset. SECT achieves an AUC of 0.943, substantially outperforming direction-agnostic methods (AUC ~0.68), and exhibits a clinical performance inversion: it excels on the sub-3 mm cohort, maintaining 0.943 AUC and 78.5% sensitivity at 95% specificity. The representation is also scanner-agnostic, achieving 0.927 mean AUC under leave-one-scanner-out (LOGO) validation across four manufacturers. By capturing asymmetric geometric invariants rather than intensity profiles, SECT reliably resolves the primary structural confounder in IA detection, positioning it as a robust downstream filter for hybrid deep-learning diagnostic pipelines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 26 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,916
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,247
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,270
  4. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,925
  5. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,322
  6. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,313
  7. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,304
  8. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,286
  9. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,049
  10. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,009
  11. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 983
  12. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 850
9 more
  1. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 750
  2. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 706
  3. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 693
  4. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 421
  5. 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 316
  6. 2024Tokenization counts: the impact of tokenization on arithmetic in frontier LLMscited by 113
  7. 2025Understanding Aha Moments: from External Observations to Internal Mechanismscited by 48
  8. 2024When Can Transformers Count to n?cited by 23
  9. 2026The Illusion of Insight in Reasoning Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.