mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantum Spectral Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2607.05307 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A core task in quantum anomaly detection is to compute an anomaly score that quantifies how strongly a test quantum state deviates from a given quantum dataset assumed to be normal. Classically, principal component analysis (PCA) for centered data computes the anomaly score by evaluating the test sample relative to the subspace spanned by the selected leading eigenvectors. However, for quantum data that lack a standard centering, explicitly recovering principal eigenvectors, constructing full Gram matrices, or loading quantum-random-access-memory-style data can be more costly than estimating the anomaly score itself. To avoid these costs, we propose Quantum Spectral Anomaly Detection (QSPADE), which computes PCA-like anomaly scores directly from the spectrum of the average state of the normal dataset. By replacing hard PCA rank selection with a smooth, temperature-controlled spectral threshold, QSPADE makes near-threshold spectral components contribute partially to the anomaly score. This makes the score vary continuously rather than jump when a borderline component is included or excluded, and makes it less sensitive to noise or arbitrary hard cutoffs near the threshold. In the zero-temperature limit, QSPADE recovers the hard-projector PCA score. The proposed measurement-based quantum detector can be calibrated with a sample complexity independent of the data dimension. Numerical simulations show that QSPADE behaves like kernel-PCA on encoded classical data and detects changes across a transverse-field Ising transition without predefined order parameters. Consequently, QSPADE gives an efficient framework for both quantum-kernel anomaly detection on encoded classical data and the monitoring of quantum-native systems where diagnostic observables are unknown.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

5 of 57 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  4. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
  5. 2023Incorporating Prior Knowledge in Deep Learning Models via Pathway Activity Autoencoderscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.