Platonic Projection Structures: Operator-Induced Observability in Representation Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We characterize observability in representation learning through Platonic Projection Structures (PPS), an operator-theoretic framework for analyzing representation accessibility under partial observation. Rather than treating observable outputs as direct reflections of latent representations, PPS models observation through a self-adjoint positive semidefinite operator acting on a latent representation space. A system is represented as a triple (H, Pi, O), where H is a latent representation space, Pi succeq 0 is an observation operator, and O(v)=langle v,Pi vrangle defines an induced scalar observable. Observability is characterized by the quotient geometry H/ker(Pi), representing equivalence classes of latent states indistinguishable under observation. We show that quantum measurement and representation inference under linear observation models share this operator-theoretic structure while differing in the algebraic properties of their observation operators; the correspondence is structural rather than physical. Representation transfer and knowledge distillation can likewise be interpreted as approximate preservation of observable geometry through Phi PiT ≈ PiS Phi. PPS also reveals a structural limitation of output-based interpretability: latent components in ker(Pi) are inaccessible from induced observables, imposing intrinsic constraints on attribution and explanation methods. Controlled empirical validations demonstrate kernel-invariant observability, projection-induced attribution gaps, and rank-controlled observable geometry in latent representation spaces. PPS thus provides an explicit characterization of observability through operator-induced quotient geometry and a unified perspective on representation accessibility, interpretability, and projection-mediated inference.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 31 references.
References · 16
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,609
- 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
- 2023Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRIcited by 68
- 2022Toward a realistic model of speech processing in the brain with self-supervised learningcited by 63
- 2022Self-supervised models of audio effectively explain human cortical responses to speechcited by 37
- 2024Improving Semantic Understanding in Speech Language Models via Brain-tuningcited by 20
- 2023Speech language models lack important brain-relevant semanticscited by 19
- 2024The Algonauts Project 2025 Challenge: How the Human Brain Makes Sense of Multimodal Moviescited by 19
- 2024The Wisdom of a Crowd of Brains: A Universal Brain Encodercited by 15
- 2026A foundation model of vision, audition, and language for in-silico neurosciencecited by 12
4 more
- 2025Transformer brain encoders explain human high-level visual responsescited by 10
- 2025Brain-tuning Improves Generalizability and Efficiency of Brain Alignment in Speech Modelscited by 4
- 2025Brain-tuned Speech Models Better Reflect Speech Processing Stages in the Braincited by 3
- 2025CNeuroMod-THINGS, a densely-sampled fMRI dataset for visual neurosciencecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.