mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hyperparameter Transfer in Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2607.05017 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of deep learning models crucially depends on the settings of hyperparameters like learning rate, initialization scale, and weight decay. Hyperparameter transfer aims to make near-optimal hyperparameter settings consistent across model scale, so that large models can be optimized by proxy tuning their smaller, cheaper-to-optimize counterparts. While transfer principles are well-studied in the context of dense neural networks in language and vision tasks, they remain comparatively under-explored for graph neural networks (GNNs). We develop and validate a transfer parameterization for GNNs trained with SGD, Adam, and AdamW. Through theoretical scaling analyses and controlled experiments, we show that the proposed parameterization yields stable feature updates, learning rate transfer, and improved performance as width and depth increase. For SGD, we identify graph-dependent first-layer correction factors and show that their use can accelerate early training in graphs with sparse bag-of-words inputs. For Adam, we explore how different message passing normalizations affect early- and late-training transfer behavior, illustrating the importance of message passing normalization and advocating for an associated hyperparameter. For AdamW, we adapt a parameterization that allows for the joint transfer of weight decay and learning rate. Together, these results provide a practical recipe for scaling GNNs across a variety of learning tasks and training scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  2. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
  3. 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
  4. 2025AbstentionBench: Reasoning LLMs Fail on Unanswerable Questionscited by 145
  5. 2025Detecting (Un)answerability in Large Language Models with Linear Directionscited by 13
  6. 2026Catching rationalization in the act: detecting motivated reasoning before and after CoT via activation probingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.