Geometry of Ordinal Representations in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work showed that language models represent character counts on curved 1D manifolds, with attention heads performing geometric transformations to enable computation. We test whether this generalizes across four ordinal tasks (bracket depth, indentation, table position, numeric magnitude) in Gemma-2-2B, Gemma-2-9B, and Qwen3-4B. We find that 1D manifolds with place-cell feature tiling emerge for tasks where the ordinal variable is locally computable from token identity, while tasks requiring cross-position integration or semantic extraction produce higher-dimensional or incoherent representations. Geometric computation is architecture-dependent: Qwen3-4B shows substantially stronger twisting than Gemma models for indentation, and its twisters preserve ordinal order, unlike its numeric twisters. Activation patching confirms that the identified manifold subspaces concentrate task-relevant information, with manifold-direction ablation causing dramatically larger probe accuracy drops than random-direction controls.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
8 more
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
- 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
- 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 73
- 2025The Origins of Representation Manifolds in Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2026When Models Manipulate Manifolds: The Geometry of a Counting Taskcited by 43
- 2025Priors in Time: Missing Inductive Biases for Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 18
- 2025Understanding sparse autoencoder scaling in the presence of feature manifoldscited by 11
- 2025Mechanistic Indicators of Understanding in Large Language Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.