One Image, No Tokens: A Controlled Study of Glyph-Based Chinese Language Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern language models generally represent text as sequences of discrete token embeddings, an assumption deeply rooted in current practice but rarely questioned. We challenge this representation, especially for Chinese, by replacing index-based token embeddings entirely with a single rasterized image of the character sequence, processed by a vision encoder composed of a shared ResNet and a shallow Vision Transformer. To isolate the role of input representation, we construct a dual-branch controlled framework in which both a Vision-based model and an index-based baseline share an identical decoder backbone, training objective, optimizer, and data curriculum. Any performance difference is therefore attributable to the input modality only. Across all tested decoder backbones, the Vision-based model consistently outperforms the baseline, reaching a peak accuracy of 0.429 versus 0.355 for the index-based baseline---a 21% relative improvement---while converging in about half the number of training epochs. The advantage emerges especially within the first five epochs (under 21% of total data) and persists under moderate character corruption: the corrupted Vision model matches the clean index-based baseline. Ablation studies reveal that the advantage requires both spatially coherent input and a ViT encoder with 2D positional encodings. A cross-script comparison on English shows the advantage does not transfer directly to alphabetic writing systems, suggesting that the uniform visual density and radical structure of Chinese characters are enabling conditions. These findings suggest that transformers are more modality-agnostic than commonly assumed, and that discrete tokenization is not a fundamental requirement for Chinese language modeling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2026.
Builds on
13 of 18 references.
References · 13
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 313
- 2021ChineseBERT: Chinese Pretraining Enhanced by Glyph and Pinyin Informationcited by 65
- 2022Language Modelling with Pixelscited by 53
- 2022CLIPPO: Image-and-Language Understanding from Pixels Onlycited by 53
- 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
- 2019Glyce: Glyph-vectors for Chinese Character Representationscited by 46
- 2025Multilingual Pretraining for Pixel Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024The Impact of Visual Information in Chinese Characters: Evaluating Large Models' Ability to Recognize and Utilize Radicalscited by 10
- 2024LogogramNLP: Comparing Visual and Textual Representations of Ancient Logographic Writing Systems for NLPcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.