mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DETECT-3B-Omni is Agnostic of Content and Demographics

arXiv 2607.03418 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.SD cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A trustworthy and GDPR-compliant deepfake audio detector must base its decisions on acoustic artifacts, not on what is being said or who is speaking. We present a large-scale study of semantic independence for Resemble AI's detector, DETECT-3B-Omni. Using 10,240 audio samples from diverse US English speakers across 30 states, generated through 8 different AI voice-cloning systems, we test whether detection accuracy depends on spoken content (benign versus malicious), speaker gender, speaker age, or speaker region. Using equivalence testing, our results show that the accuracy difference between any two of these groups is at most 2 percentage points, at 99% confidence. The detector therefore identifies AI-generated audio with equivalent accuracy regardless of what the audio says or who the speaker is.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

6 of 10 references.

References · 6

  1. 2024F5-TTS: A Fairytaler that Fakes Fluent and Faithful Speech with Flow Matchingcited by 353
  2. 2024XTTS: a Massively Multilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech Modelcited by 174
  3. 2024E2 TTS: Embarrassingly Easy Fully Non-Autoregressive Zero-Shot TTScited by 149
  4. 2022Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?cited by 129
  5. 2026Qwen3-TTS Technical Reportcited by 106
  6. 2025MegaTTS 3: Sparse Alignment Enhanced Latent Diffusion Transformer for Zero-Shot Speech Synthesiscited by 39

Built on by

Not cited yet.