mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robustness Meets Uncertainty: Evidential Adversarial Training for Robust Selective Classification

arXiv 2607.03075 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety-critical applications require classifiers that are both robust and reliable. Adversarial training is a widely adopted defense for improving robustness in deep neural networks; however, its effect on the reliability of predictive uncertainty remains underexplored. We investigate this gap through the lens of selective classification, which has rarely been systematically analyzed alongside adversarial robustness. We introduce a unified benchmark for the robustness-uncertainty trade-off. It standardizes architectures, augmentations, threat models, and evaluation metrics across clean, adversarial, and common-corruption settings. Across a wide range of state-of-the-art adversarial training methods, we uncover a recurring failure mode: several approaches improve robust accuracy while degrading uncertainty ranking, leading to poorer selective behavior. To address this, we propose Evidential Adversarial Training (EV-AT), which models uncertainty through a Dirichlet distribution and combines (i) an evidence-based loss promoting clean accuracy and reliable uncertainty with (ii) a robust evidence-alignment loss matching clean and adversarial predictions in log Dirichlet-parameter space. Extensive experiments show that EV-AT shifts the Pareto frontier of robustness-uncertainty trade-offs beyond prior state-of-the-art adversarial training methods. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/NicolasSournac/Robustness_Meets_Uncertainty.EV-AT.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

1 of 58 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025Robustness and uncertainty: two complementary aspects of the reliability of the predictions of a classifiercited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.