mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Double-Helix Active Geometry: LiDAR-Anchored Multi-View Depth with Selective Abstention

arXiv 2607.02561 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consumer depth sensors such as the LiDAR scanner on recent iPhones provide metric range, but their useful range is short and their returns are sparse. We present DH-Active, a lightweight, training-free geometry back-end that treats the sensor as a metric ruler rather than the sole source of depth. Near-field returns anchor the metric relative pose of two views through PnP; visually trackable samples without a valid depth return are then triangulated under that pose. A parallax/reprojection gate abstains wherever the geometry is ill-conditioned, leaving an explicit hole and a selective score instead of forcing an estimate. The measured core front end, including spiral sampling, sparse back-projection, and hole taxonomy but excluding preprocessing and multi-view recovery, runs at 1.11 ms median latency on CPU (OpenCV using 14 threads), about 38 times faster than a DINOv2-L visual branch on GPU in our timing setup. Across two iPhone captures and the public TUM RGB-D and ARKitScenes benchmarks, held-out depth is recovered at 1.4 to 6.7 percent median relative error. In a controlled ARKitScenes protocol that uses only returns within 2 m to set scale and an independent laser scan as ground truth, DH-Active achieves 64.2 percent scene-median coverage of evaluable far-field candidates at 13.4 percent scene-median relative error; direct triangulation from the device trajectory is not usable. We also report the alternatives that failed in our tests: single-frame defocus, classical focus-stack depth, defocus-LiDAR fusion, point-to-point ICP over a good visual-inertial track, and attention-to-holes resampling. A 1.26 B learned model remains more accurate after oracle scale alignment. The contribution here is narrower: metric sparse depth, explicit abstention, zero learned parameters, and near-millisecond CPU cost.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  4. 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,526
  5. 2025VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformercited by 1,475
  6. 2020ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAMcited by 862
  7. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  8. 2021ARKitScenes: A Diverse Real-World Dataset For 3D Indoor Scene Understanding Using Mobile RGB-D Datacited by 442
  9. 2023RH20T: A Comprehensive Robotic Dataset for Learning Diverse Skills in One-Shotcited by 173
  10. 2018Deep Depth Completion of a Single RGB-D Imagecited by 110
  11. 2019Unsupervised Depth Completion from Visual Inertial Odometrycited by 88
  12. 2020Focus on defocus: bridging the synthetic to real domain gap for depth estimationcited by 37
2 more
  1. 2017Deep Depth From Focuscited by 28
  2. 2026LiDAR Prompted Spatio-Temporal Multi-View Stereo for Autonomous Drivingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.