mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimal Stabilizer Testing and Learning with Limited Quantum Memory

arXiv 2607.02444 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026quant-ph cs.CC cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown n-qubit state, but may keep only k qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test n-qubit stabilizer states using 6 copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of Theta(n). We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is lost under memory constraints. More concretely we show that (1) The sample complexity of testing stabilizer states in the k-qubit memory framework is Theta(n-k). Our upper bound goes via a novel connection to the hidden shift problem and the lower bound is proven using a novel approach to average case bounds on likelihood ratios via combinatorics of the stochastic orthogonal group. (2) The sample complexity of learning stabilizer states with k qubits of memory, in the non-adaptive framework, is Theta(n2/k). As a further application of our techniques, we prove an exponential lower bound for purity testing even when the memory may be left coherent throughout the protocol. Our main results identify coherent quantum memory as the resource enabling the usual separation between stabilizer testing and learning. In particular, even with k=0.99n qubits of memory, there is no constant-copy stabilizer tester; furthermore for k=cn qubits of memory (for 0< c < 1), stabilizer testing is as hard as learning, with both requiring Theta(n) copies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

1 of 61 references.

References · 1

  1. 2024On the sample complexity of purity and inner product estimationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.