mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Auditing Residual Drifting for Pathology-Preserving Accelerated Knee MRI

arXiv 2607.02428 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accelerated magnetic resonance imaging reduces acquisition time, but reconstruction from undersampled k-space can blur diagnostically relevant structures or introduce failures that are not captured by global image metrics. We propose SA-RDM-DC, a Self-Auditing Residual generative Drifting Model with Data Consistency for accelerated knee MRI. The method adapts the newly proposed generative drifting paradigm to accelerated MRI by training a physics-conditioned drift field from the zero-filled reconstruction toward the fully sampled residual correction. It predicts image- and missing-k-space residual corrections, enforces data consistency with acquired k-space, uses frequency-aware and residual drifting supervision to recover fine detail, and produces dense error maps and slice-level risk scores in the same inference pass. We evaluate SA-RDM-DC on multi-coil fastMRI knee data at acceleration factors of 4, 8, and 12, with fastMRI+ pathology annotations for region-level and classifier-based task preservation, and on SKM-TEA for zero-shot and fine-tuned protocol-shift evaluation. Compared with zero-filled reconstruction, UNet-image-SENSE, DC-UNet, Score-Diffusion, ELF-Diff, SENSE-VarNet, and MoDL baselines, SA-RDM-DC achieves the highest SSIM across fastMRI acceleration factors while retaining subsecond per-slice inference and avoiding the long sampling time of iterative diffusion baselines. In pathology-aware analysis, SA-RDM-DC preserves lesion-region structural fidelity and reduces meniscus prediction instability. Its self-auditing scores strongly identify high-error reconstructions on fastMRI and partially transfer as a selective-review signal under SKM-TEA protocol shift. These results support reconstruction evaluation that jointly considers image fidelity, pathology preservation, runtime, and case-specific reliability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

23 of 35 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  4. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
  5. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  6. 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 464
  7. 2017MoDL: Model Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problemscited by 384
  8. 2017Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Datacited by 340
  9. 2021Score-based diffusion models for accelerated MRIcited by 308
  10. 2017A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstructioncited by 231
  11. 2020End-to-End Variational Networks for Accelerated MRI Reconstructioncited by 201
  12. 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 162
11 more
  1. 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 98
  2. 2019Uncertainty Quantification in Deep MRI Reconstructioncited by 49
  3. 2022SKM-TEA: A Dataset for Accelerated MRI Reconstruction with Dense Image Labels for Quantitative Clinical Evaluationcited by 42
  4. 2022High-Frequency Space Diffusion Models for Accelerated MRIcited by 41
  5. 2023Learning Fourier-Constrained Diffusion Bridges for MRI Reconstructioncited by 13
  6. 2023SPIRiT-Diffusion: Self-Consistency Driven Diffusion Model for Accelerated MRIcited by 12
  7. 2024Comparative Benchmarking of Failure Detection Methods in Medical Image Segmentation: Unveiling the Role of Confidence Aggregationcited by 12
  8. 2020Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstructioncited by 9
  9. 2021Estimating MRI Image Quality via Image Reconstruction Uncertaintycited by 3
  10. 2023PixCUE: Joint Uncertainty Estimation and Image Reconstruction in MRI using Deep Pixel Classificationcited by 3
  11. 2026RDDM: A Residual-Driven Drifting Model for High-Fidelity Low-Dose CT Denoisingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.